Content strategy and philosophy

Greg Wyatt • April 27, 2026

What follows is Chapter 40 of A Career Breakdown Kit, and part two of a three part series on Personal Branding.


Except it isn't. There are various definitions I revolt against, with good reason, in a job search.


Personal branding, hidden jobs markets, ATS compliance, and all the others. Terms that seem to hide secret wins, not replicable steps, especially when hidden behind a paywall.


I call it the title that's expected because of the questions job seekers ask me.


You may recall my article on the Hidden Jobs Market breaks it apart and rebuilds it into a cohesive multichannel marketing strategy that allows you to access the whole of your jobs market.


And so it is with my personal branding series.


This isn't about your brand. Or even about your reputation.


It's about pushing content that starts conversations with relevant people - such as peers, former colleagues, recruiters with a vested interest in these content areas, and even people that can put you closer to a job. Not forgetting fellow job seekers you can share experiences with - as long as you don't dwell on the negative.


And it's also about writing in a way that is both true to you and your profession - because conversation has to follow in the same voice as you write, and should support your work, when in work.


It's a strategy and philosophy that mirrors earlier chapters on networking, doorknocking, getting found and converting interest.


It isn't about writing credible statements in a content savvy way that shares unprovable anecdotes, hacks that lack substance, and where a funnel means more than a lesson. That way is the way of social media marketing - this is about conversations that matter.


40 - Content strategy and philosophy

 

While a personal brand might be the goal, your content strategy should be the priority. It can be applied even if you don’t like the idea of branding.


Much is made about LinkedIn’s algorithm and how you need to do this that and the other to get engagement.


You can look at it differently, ignoring the algorithm on the whole, and still achieve much the same.


These are the outcomes I aim for and see when writing content:


  • Start conversations
  • Help others
  • Sharpen and spark ideas
  • Raise awareness and trust
  • Have a laugh and a chat


I’ve gained friends I’ve never spoken to and friendly acquaintances I only know through ‘comments.’


As well as paying clients who have benefitted from my service.


Just as importantly, I have more credibility with candidates who place weight on LinkedIn content.


Content makes it easier for me to start conversations.


It’s important for me that I either enjoy the content and its consequences or find it fulfilling.


I don’t talk openly about my personal life, family or challenges. Something I agreed with my wife when I started publishing content.


Instead, I show all of myself in my words - quirks and all. So that if we ever speak in real life, there isn’t much of a disconnect.


Start with other people’s content


Find content writers who inspire you and use them as a catalyst for your own words.


There are two ways to do this.


Firstly, if you’re thinking about writing on LinkedIn, you are presumably already reading content.


What inspires you? What do you enjoy reading? Which authors resonate with your career, your values, your goals and the problems you solve?


When you read their content, do you engage and comment? Do you connect with them? Do you ask them who they recommend as writers in your field?


Secondly, look within.


What do you want to be known for in your career?


Maybe it’s procurement or your CIPD membership. React or agile. 5 Whys or Gemba.


If these are areas that interest you, use the LinkedIn search bar to find posts on these topics.


Now filter the results by ‘Posts’ and ‘Sort by’ latest.


Read through the results both for posts that interest you and those that have high engagement (less likely on a niche topic).


When you’ve found inspiring content, what next?


One first step in content creation is to respond to these posts with your own ideas. Less ‘Agree’ and more how you might respond in a real-life conversation on this topic.


Commenting on other people’s posts is a good way to find your voice, particularly if the conversation continues.


Like any skill, writing takes practice, and comments are a low-friction way of developing your tone.


If a comment sparks interest from other readers, it can be a concept to build on as a post in its own right.


The other benefit of this kind of niche content is that those who engage are likely to have similar interests to you.


Make sure to read other comments and see if there are more conversations to be had.


The comments you build with them can be the start of a mutually beneficial relationship.


Check out their profiles - do their interests and values reflect yours?


These are people to connect with, then DM to continue the conversation.


Check out their posting history, which will be available on their profile - there may well be a lot of interesting content to absorb.


With conversation comes content. Ideas and discussion that grow are an effective way to share your voice.


Here’s a suggestion for how you can do this in practice:


  • Look for 5 posts daily that interest you professionally - manually, using a search, or checking what your valuable connections are up to
  • Engage and comment on each
  • Check out new relevant profiles - connect and follow their content
  • On each post, look at who is engaging and respond naturally
  • Try to connect with 5 new relevant people from these interactions
  • Perhaps follow up with a message
  • Take note of the most interesting conversations and at the end of the week pick at least one to inspire your own posts
  • You don’t need to publish them if you aren’t comfortable - save for later if not


I’d avoid the viral content that combines relevance + relatability + entitlement + readability. These writers are more interested in engagement numbers than your specific interest.


You can see the truth of their words in how they respond in the comments sections.


From a marketing perspective, different types of content have different places in your lead generation:


  • Awareness
  • Interest
  • Consideration
  • Evaluation
  • Purchase


Each post, comment, DM and real-life conversation can relate to these steps and support your goals, even if you aren’t treating these as a marketing activity.


Time and time again


There’s a lot of investigation into optimal times to post. It’s more important that you are available to reply attentively in the first hour.


The course of a post is often dictated by the performance during this time.


I actively reply to comments for around an hour a day with LinkedIn on in the background of other work.


How much time can you set aside per week and per day for content?


Even if you only write a couple of posts a week, this will probably take a couple of hours.


You can expect low performance initially, with some exceptions, as it takes time to build inertia.


Set aside a sustainable amount of time each week and commit to it over a period - try for 10-12 weeks and track how things have developed.


You may find it becomes an enjoyable task. Try not to get distracted by engagement for its own sake and keep your goals in mind.


Types of content to try


Engagement on LinkedIn is built primarily on relevance and relatability. Even ragebait, given it drives strong feeling.


You can write a 100% relatable post that everyone takes relevance from and see massive engagement. Though that engagement may not serve your goals.


Or you can write a post that is 100% relevant to the problems you solve in your career, and the people who will find it relevant are from a small niche facing the same problems.


This is why a photo of you with your dog will fly, while a carefully thought out post about the optimisation of widgets in a byzantine setting will appear to be shouting into a void.


Or you can blend the two through storytelling, pivoting observations into business content, and copywriting formulae like AIDA (attention interest desire action) and PAS (problem agitation solution).


Everyone will have different forms of content that will be effective for them.


What do you want your ideal readers to experience?


What would ‘you five years ago’ would find helpful?


Do you want readers to see you as a credible expert?


Someone who is authentically vulnerable?


Your warts and all personality?


Someone who stands out in a sea of competition?


Someone who is thought-provoking, helpful, or altruistic?


The answers are much the same if you posed these questions of interviewing.


This is no coincidence, given your message should be consistently delivered no matter where it is received.


With that in mind, here are some content ideas you can try:


  • How you might solve a problem specific to your industry
  • Stories from your everyday life
  • The challenges in your job search
  • Observations on a news story and how it relates to your work
  • A flair post highlighting your availability
  • Asking for thoughts on an idea you are interested in
  • Sharing insight you find fascinating, whether that’s films, video games, science or sport
  • Stories from your career where you can show growth (everyone loves a hero’s journey)
  • Business frameworks, processes and techniques you find useful - Pomodoro Technique, scientific method, STAR, what do you use?
  • Equipment you use for work
  • Developments in your workplace and culture
  • Thoughts on content you find inspiring
  • Memes, humour, satire


Google content ideas for LinkedIn or ask ChatGPT, Claude and others.


I wouldn’t use AI to write articles. I do use them for ideation and to sense check.


‘Write me a post for LinkedIn that shows the link between Tesla cars and how to develop an HR strategy.’


The vulnerability of writing


You can be a content creator without ever publishing a post if you continue conversations through comments, connections, DMs and real-life.


This avoids sticking your head above the parapets and is low risk, but misses the gain of publishing your own content.


I know that some people are held back for fear of failure. I can tell you that clicking ‘send’ is always a high point of anxiety for me in sending newsletters. Imagine how I felt when I clicked Publish for this book.


What’s the worst that can happen with a carefully thought-out post?


Tumbleweed?


If no one reads it, you can always post it again another time.


Disagreement?


Loads of people disagree on my posts - you’ll see from my comments that I am always constructive in my dialogue and typically this supports the intent of my post.


Everyone has an opinion and they are welcome to theirs - as long as it’s constructive, there is always a learning opportunity.


Trolls?


These people exist and will at some point rear their ugly heads. I imagine them naked on the Underground, which takes the sting out of their vitriol. I’m sure it’s their unhappiness that drives their behaviour.


Marriage requests?


Unfortunately, dubious and toxic behaviour isn’t uncommon.


Don’t be afraid to block and report if you receive harmful messages.


As long as you are constructive in what you write and you work to build a conversation, it’s unlikely anything bad will happen. You will open yourself up to the opportunity of new relevant people starting conversations with you:


hiring managers, recruiters, peers, fellow job seekers, and friendly strangers.


Weight and depth of opinion


A couple of years ago, I had a message from an out-of-work Sales Director asking for some feedback.


He’d shot a video for LinkedIn where he talked about why he should be snapped up and received a lot of praise for the post. However, he was confused because a CEO he trusts told him it was poor and made him look boring.


He knew I’d give him unvarnished feedback, which was what he needed to find some clarity on what had happened.


Truthfully, the CEO was correct.


What had happened?


All of the positive engagement was from fellow job seekers and people who wanted to support him. That he’d done it was praiseworthy in itself and was rightly celebrated, rather than the quality of what he had produced.


None of them had hiring authority or were in a career similar to someone who would be his line manager.


The video didn’t show him how he comes across in person either.


While the positive feedback was fantastic for validation, his video worked against him. What might happen if a hiring process thought his video was boring when the role being recruited for has persuasion as a key requirement?


I’m pleased to say his redo was excellent, showing off his charisma while delivering the same message.


Who can you rely on to be this CEO for you in your career?


Why you should start now, even if you don’t see any benefit for months.


Starting cold on LinkedIn can take time to get traction.


When your first post bombs you might never think to do a second.


Going in with the expectation of little impact for the first three to six months is healthy in making a sustainable habit.


If you’re out of work though, three to six months may seem too far off to be worthwhile when there are many activities that offer a quick turnaround, such as applying for jobs.


I’ve spoken to many job seekers who’ve been out of work for more than six months and had decided not to write content at the outset of their search.


If they had, they might now be seeing the benefit of their work.



By Greg Wyatt June 11, 2026
What follows is Chapter 43 from A Career Breakdown Kit. Is it a magic salve guaranteed for success? No of course not. But much like anything in a job search, nothing is guaranteed. What we do is identify which avenues can be effective for your context, and form an appropriate strategy. LinkedIn optimisation is great if people search for you on LinkedIn. Except speaking to my recruitment peers, fewer and fewer rely on it. Would it surprise you if I told you I rarely invested in at all before 2019? I've been working in recruitment since 1996 including at CEO level. Applications, networking, referrals, content, CV databases. All have a place and a purpose. Doorknocking on the other hand - some would tell you it has no place in the modern job search. If my daughter*, her friends and other 18 year olds can get a job from an old school technique, while those employers say "only through Indeed" then that might be a hint it still works. Some of whom are socially anxious, but then it's a replicable process, not a cult of personality. Or the periodic messages I get from CxOs who made their own jobs from direct outreach. Not forgetting Granovetter's seminal research and recent LinkedIn-specific studies in Science journal showing weak ties drive more job mobility than strong ties. And why wouldn't doorknocking work on LinkedIn, when you have a weak tie that suggests a viable employer? But no, it's not a guarantee. It's just an arrow in the quiver of a multichannel job search. 43 - How to doorknock Doorknocking is an old-school sales approach you may well have experienced, such as when a salesperson with a clipboard rings your doorbell and asks you to change electricity provider. My wife even once bought from exactly this scenario. While it’s not uncommon in a business-to-consumer situation it can also work business-to-business… if you can get past security. Although technology has moved on, the principle is the same whether in person, by phone, email, letter or LinkedIn: You approach someone cold and create your own opportunity. This isn’t an approach for everyone and requires chutzpah. If you are used to a high failure rate in applications - what do you have to lose by being proactive? More than that - look at all the advice on LinkedIn on how to improve your odds in a job search. It’s all transactional and applicable, available to everyone - if you all follow it, everyone takes the same step forward. While taking steps others are less prepared to do means the approach alone may stand out. If you encounter the equivalent of a sign which says, ‘Trespassers will be shot!’, pay attention. My own career of looking for work includes many non-transactional approaches: Walked into the local Cinema and asked for a job Walked into Office World and asked for a job Worked for Dad Talked to one of my ex-colleagues and gained some by-the-call phone research work Temped through an agency Walked into an Inn and asked for a job Referred to a publishing, training & consulting company In managing their small-scale recruitment alongside my day job I got to know the MD of a recruitment firm as a supplier. I went to work there Tapped up to return to a more senior role Started my business upon being given the boot - thanks Dave! It’s true I did apply through job boards and agencies. It’s mainly through my own means that I have secured my employment. *My daughter even tried doorknocking for her first job in our local town last summer. It didn’t work for her - she found a nice retail job through an application on Indeed. Her experience was positive enough that she helped a friend do the same - who got a job at the first shop they tried. Doorknocking is about approaching companies by category not because they are recruiting. These categories can be: All the employers in your local business park (often they have websites, with directories and job adverts) Companies listed in local newspapers, directories or platforms (local to me this could be Cambridge Evening News, Bury Free Press, Cambridge Network or Business Weekly) Top 100 employers in your domain Companies that have recently had funding and are about to scale Doorknocking companies you’ve come across through networking and its resulting market map Make contact and make a case for yourself on the principle of the right person, right time, right place, right message, right offer, and right price. There’s an element of luck involved for these elements to all come together. A disadvantage is that they may not be recruiting or ever have a need to employ you and even if they do have a vacancy, you still have to establish the right fit. That means a logically low hit rate. Your threshold for an acceptable failure rate will inform whether this is the right approach for you. The difference is the anonymous rejection of a volume-based application versus the ‘personal rejection’ from your direct outbound approach. Right person, right time, right place, right message, right offer, and right price. Let’s reorder and examine this marketing principle: Right Place Those Categories above. The place is the Company, and how you contact them. You can go in blind if you are a bold prospector or research them in advance. ‘site:’ is a useful command in Google. You can search on specific websites: ‘site: linkedin.com ACME jobs’ Right Person Typically this will be the ‘next one up’ - Head of department, Director, CxO or Owner. Who would be the budget holder at work? Those are prospects. Look them up on LinkedIn, PR, news, video platforms. What can you find out? Right Time While time can be happenstance, can timed factors create opportunity? What might be a hiring trigger? Perhaps you could contact a list of companies that have recently announced funding or a big win - news that may lead to hiring additional people. Or maybe you hear through the grapevine that Janine is about to go off on maternity leave. If their process isn’t time-bound, can you make it time-bound? ‘We aren’t hiring right now’ might mean they’ve run out of headcount in the January to June period and may have a new budget in July. What can you learn that helps you both? If you have radio silence, why not try again in a month or three months? Think about how you buy. If you don’t need something how likely are you to respond to a message no matter how well crafted? If you do need something you might think first of someone who keeps in regular touch. Right Offer You have more opportunity for career creativity in being unemployed than someone entrenched in a 9 to 5 permanent job. What problems can you fix for a company in a non-traditional employment capacity? Let’s say an employer has a problem that needs fixing. They don’t have capacity to do it right now. It isn’t burning enough to seek professional help and there isn’t sufficient work in view to make it a job. What if you caught them at the right time? An out-of-work TA Manager who offered to revamp an onboarding process. A web designer who notes lots of issues with their website. A strategic operational issue that is their unknown unknown identified by your expertise. A swamped team that could benefit from their admin burden being reduced. An orchard that needs pickers at harvest time. What starts out as a short-term, project, or part-time piece of work can become proof of concept. While rare, I know a few people whose permanent full-time jobs have come about this way, including at a senior level. Right message This is both specific and crude. It’s specific because nailing the message CAN create an opportunity a poorly written message may miss. It’s crude because sometimes you can catch people at the right time, no matter how cruddy your message is. This is the case in recruitment - I’ve picked up several senior appointments by calling at the right time. ‘I’m glad you called Greg, I’m starting to think about my maternity cover in June.’ Had I not called, that HR Director may well have gone to the specialist HR recruiters she is also in touch with. If you have a strong hook in your message - such as a key area of rare expertise or a clear issue you’ve identified which companies may have - go in with that. If you don’t - done is better than procrastinating: ‘Hi Greg, I live locally to Bircham Wyatt Recruitment. Love what you do. I wondered if you might be recruiting for an apple picker at any point. If you can’t help, could you point me in the right direction?’ Right price I’ve left this until the end because much of this is variable and subjective. What are your needs? What can they afford? What does the market say? How flexible can you be? Research will help if you can get a sense of what they generally pay through Indeed, Glassdoor or others. Or maybe what comparable companies that are advertising will pay. One approach might be to pro-rate your salary over the period you’ll work there. Doorknocking can sometimes give you access to jobs that are being actively recruited. It’s a happy byproduct of your work, if you find yourself in this situation. It’s worth persevering. Otherwise, it’s too easy to think after 10, 20, or 100 unsuccessful efforts that the approach itself is at fault. There is always an element of luck in any activity. This may be out of your comfort zone, in which case it’s an opportunity to grow. The only certain thing is that if you don’t try you definitely won’t benefit.
By Greg Wyatt June 4, 2026
Listening to the consequences of your recruitment process is an opportunity. I do find it interesting go through my older articles. How has my thinking changed? Has it improved? How was I so cringy? Looking at this article in its August 2023 form, I hadn't yet focused on Candidate Resentment as an opportunity to improve how we recruit. Not because it's decent to treat people better, but because that is a happy byproduct of strategically assessing our work as it supports our goals. Whether that's filling vacancies or finding people that meet our goals long-term and flourish doing so. Root canal If you recognise that speaking to the potential problems of the people you want to engage is a good idea, you may also recognise why you shouldn't create any problems that push them away. Engagement is an ongoing process that carries through every stage of recruitment, even into employment. Yes, bring your candidates forward, in part by showing how you solve their career problems. But, don’t throw up unnecessary issues that undo your good work. Listening to the consequences of your recruitment process is an opportunity. Why did that candidate proceed? Why did another withdraw? What raised concern? What about the potential candidates we don’t even know about? What influenced their decisions? I’ve spoken to tens of thousands of candidates, prospects, applicants, and everything else, during my career. Out of curiosity, I’m always interested in what influences their decisions in their pursuit of a new career. What fascinates me is that these are the Gemba , the unknown unknowns that we can extrapolate into our own recruitment processes. What problems do they encounter elsewhere, that discourage them from applying, that encourage them to withdraw, and why? And how might we be guilty of the same? While if we are guilty, how can we fix these problems, so that the objection never comes up? Imagine that - the reader that might have walked away, who instead chooses to engage. This may seem an unknowable unknown, but one of the benefits of my job seeker work is hearing about the issues they encounter on their side of recruitment and how that may influence their decisions. Considering these are people that are very problem aware, their appetite for bullshit is in some ways higher than the problem unaware (passive in old speak). While in others, what you may consider normal behaviour, they consider red flags. While we can’t control the behaviour of candidates, we can learn what influences their behaviour and form a process that nudges, draws forward or mitigates when needed. What are we accountable for that might present a problem for a candidate we want to employ? Especially when, in normal life, moving jobs is one of the biggest stresses? How might we unnecessarily cause scepticism or anxiety? Auditing your own recruitment process as a mystery candidate is one opportunity. As is surveying your staff for their experience - with the caveat they are happy to be working for you, skewing their perception. Or perhaps they're terrified of losing their jobs. Do they really want to rock the boat with criticism? But it’s the candidates who withdraw, who hesitate, who object that can be the source of the biggest improvements. What would you say their common complaints are? You can look to LinkedIn for the answer, in their high-engagement posts. Salary on the job description (they mean the advert) ATS data duplication Responsiveness and transparency Tardy, bloated and unnecessary recruitment stages A robotic process that forgot they are human Which becomes your choice. Do you look within and challenge yourself with 5 Whys to see how you can improve? Do you take away problems before they can occur? Saving your candidates unnecessary toothache? Or do you lay blame on the areas you can’t control? Those are the questions. Regards, Greg p.s. I’m available for interesting work - UK key hires, fractional talent acquisition and recruitment writing. Maybe we can talk. p.p.s. A Recruitment AiDE is out now - the discipline for UK key hire recruitment