LinkedIn profiles that convert

Greg Wyatt • February 21, 2024

This is an article in four parts:

  1. An analogy to help you understand how people with hiring responsibility consume your content

  2. How this relates to your LinkedIn profile and other documents

  3. An exercise you can do now

  4. Practical takeaways

This has a bit of danger of overwhelm; however, it’s important to understand the context and mindset behind searching for candidates so that you can help a hiring process make the right decision.

By hiring process, I mean anyone from recruiter and hiring manager, to agency, to a peer who can advocate for you, to a fellow job seeker that happens to know about a vacancy you are suitable for.

Help us help you through your content.


Part 1 - an Amazon (job) search

When I buy a commodity item on Amazon there are two stages to my buying process.

I know what I want, and I have to find an acceptable shortlist of possibilities, and then decide on what to buy.

As a sweaty runner that clocks up 60-70km a week, I go through Bluetooth Headphones like you wouldn’t believe.

I’m also deaf in one ear and can’t tell the difference in varying sound formats.

So my context is a little different to the normal buyer, although likely no more different than most are to another.

A search on “Bluetooth headphones” brings up over 2,000 results, which is hardly manageable, so I change the search to “waterproof Bluetooth headphones” and filter by:

£15-£30; in ear; Prime; running.

125 results. Much better.

Now I scan down the list and I ignore Sponsored, I’m not sure why.

Click on the first one with a relevant headline, promising 50hrs playtime, and skim past all the marketing twaddle. Who cares what they say - what do their buyers think?

I go straight to the three-star reviews (my hack for avoiding paid reviews) because they are generally good with caveats, then click away.

One of the three-star reviews says they were offered a discount to change it to five. That’s BS that turns me right off.

I click through a few more products and buy one. The decent guarantee swung it for me.

I didn’t get past the first 40 results.


Now think about your own commodity purchases, where you have to do a differing levels of research to get what you need.

What kind of search criteria do you use?

How do you filter?

What informs your decision to buy?

Perhaps you already know what you want to buy, having researched buyers’ guides, YouTube videos and users’ forums, and are just sourcing the best price.

Or maybe you just need something adequate, and literally anything above an acceptable threshold will do - 5 minutes and done.

These are examples of a buyer’s journey across a transactional process.

Which isn’t far removed from how recruiters might search for candidates.

Not just on LinkedIn, but through other channels too.


Part 2 - bringing it back to your job search

LinkedIn and Amazon - what’s the difference?

In a hiring process, they are both volume, transactional marketplaces that allow searches and filters to create an appropriate shortlist to read through.

As with a product on Amazon, your LinkedIn profile is one of many that fit broadly similar criteria and might be found at any stage in a recruitment process.

  • From a search through the Recruiter Licence

  • Out of curiosity from a comment or post you wrote

  • Checking it out on receipt of an application

  • Because you were recommended

  • Because you worked at a certain company

In the same way customers might visit a product page on Amazon, so too might someone hiring visit your profile.

This means that it doesn’t have to just stand on its own merits, it has to corroborate and support any other documentation a reader might have come across:

  • Your CV or application

  • Your LinkedIn posts and comments

  • Something you did that’s in the public domain - an interview, video, article

Where there’s a conflict, such as an overly customised CV that contradicts your LinkedIn profile - that can be a problem.

Assuming your contents all support each other, the aim is to prompt an action.

Unlike an Amazon purchase, you aren’t expecting a sale, simply for the right people to start a conversation that meets your goals.

But to convert interest into an action, first, you have to be found.


Think about an Amazon product page and the process you go through to buy - what do you typically read and in which order?

It’s probably something like <home page - search - list of product headlines>. Then my reading journey on a product page is <headline - price - delivery - three star reviews - buy now>.

How does your profile page cater to the reading psychology of a recruiter?

While a recruiter likely has access to the Recruiter Licence, you probably don’t, so I’ll write this in a way you can emulate, as a standard or Premium Member. (You can look at public user guides if you are interested, such as here)

A standard search might go across <home page - search - list of profile headlines>. Then the reading psychology of someone who wants to read everything (!) is:

  • #Open to Work banner (your choice and no discussion today on its merits)

  • Headline

  • Banner

  • Location / Contact details (depending on connection and privacy settings)

  • Activity / Featured Section / About (the order depends on whether you have Creator mode or not)

  • Experience

  • Education

  • Projects

  • Skills

  • Recommendations

Unlike Amazon reviews though, I rarely look at recommendations, as if I’m still interested by that point I’ll just get in touch.

You can also download your profile as a PDF, which looks like a CV / resume with contact details, headline, summary and experience.

In both your profile and the downloadable PDF, your headline and summary/About are going to be read before your experience (career history) is.

It goes to follow that’s where a lot of the decision to contact you will come from.

While the career section is important, if an attention-short reader doesn’t get that far, it won’t help convert interest.


Part 3 - an exercise to guide your approach to updating your profile

Imagine you’ve been promoted and you are tasked with recruiting your replacement.

The rules are that you are only allowed to search for candidates on LinkedIn through your standard membership.

You only have 10 minutes to run a search, and 20 minutes to form a shortlist of 3 top candidates from the results.

Location and salary don’t matter for now.

It’s likely you’ll search on your job titles, job specific skills and qualifications.

What do the results look like?

Pick your three favourite profiles from the results.

Now compare them against your own profile, step by step through the points in part 2.

Would you make your own shortlist based purely on the content?

If not, what is it about their profiles that is preferrable and how can you emulate the same in your profile?

What is it in their content that has converted you from being a passive reader to having them on your imaginary shortlist?


Part 4 - actionable points to update your profile (and CV too)

You want people with hiring authority to look at your profile and from there want to contact you.

And you should assume the people doing so are the weakest link in the chain.

Because if you cater to them, you also cater to more competent people in process.

How can you help them see you as a candidate of choice?

4.1 a punchy headline that says what you do and how you can help. The first four words count - think about those Amazon product headlines. If you don’t read further than the first four words, you’ll never know what you missed. Check out how other people’s headlines look on your mobile phone, when on their profile or if they are replying to a comment on a post - lead with relevance.

Scrap “I help companies by” because it’s meaningless. Start with your job title, then add a flourish or context. “CTO - scale-up deep techs. Equity backed and privately owned. £20m to £120m in three years”

4.2 banner - it’s free advertising real estate! Use canva; include your contact details in case a reader doesn’t have access through your account

4.3 make it really easy to contact you by phone or email, put it in multiple spots

4.4. About section - who do you help and how? What are your key skills and achievements? Keep it concise and focused on your ideal audience - move away from the ‘responsibilities led’ approach to CVs that get copied onto LinkedIn. Show context.

4.5 While your career section is further down, and may not even be read, it should still be fully populated and credible.

4.5 How can you highlight posts, videos and articles to support your candidacy? The Featured Section is a great facility in Creator mode.

4.6 Key words. Recruiters search on key words. Think about all the job adverts and required skills you’ve read - does your LinkedIn profile show these suitably? Of course these need to be true, but think about how differing acronyms and terminology may mean the same thing.

4.7 Personal branding. How can you showcase your personality in your words? Your about section is a form of elevator pitch. While it highlight your professional credibility, you can also show your personal qualities. What your most passionate about and best at? Lead with that.

4.8 It’s not about you. It’s about the needs of your reader - tell us what we need to know to make an informed decision on your candidacy. Answer the questions that we should have through your content.

4.9 Keep it simple and authentic.

4.10 If there’s something you want us to know, make it clear. This could be anything from the job you want, to part-time status, to highlighting a recommendation you are proud of.

I've mentioned ‘CV too’ as the same principles that let you get found apply here.

Principles that are used in SEO - read up on how Google prioritises expertise, experience, authorativeness and trustworthiness and they apply to how readers consume your content too.

Googling isn't just about key words, nor is your own LinkedIn profile.


As with the previous articles, this is both long and not detailed enough, but I hope is a good lens through which to think about what your readers need from your profile.

You are unique, even if your role is common. Help us see why you are the one person for the job, and you’ll get more interest for that one job you need.

Thanks for reading.

Greg

By Greg Wyatt • November 5, 2026
It's interesting revisiting this article from 3 years ago, especially now AI products are more embedded in market. If anything my view on AI is more polarised, bringing many new opportunites, brand new problems, as well as the existential angst many are talking about. For me, codifying my experience with AI tools means I can help more people, while freeing up my time to do more human work. It's certainly helped with job seeker support, and increasingly so in my recruitment work. Mainly it's giving me more time to talk to people, and when homogenous AI applications at scale are one new problem, as well as the increasing threat of deep fake interviews, in person conversations might be a necessary exnovation (just googled that - what a great word that I will now abuse at scale). While the article below has dated somewhat, I think the threat it assesses has never been more pertinent. I've said for some time that AI might be the death of knowledge and judgement, even so far as 'meaning', something that this recent research also indicates . Importantly the research doesn't say the recommendations were wrong, just how they were followed. Read that article and think about how AI recommendations on applications relate. I've certainly found them more problematic, so far, than the old school ATS style ranking and filtering - because of the false confidence they convey, especially when dealing with non-traditional applications. Things may improve, or so is promised. And while words might be the first facility of LLM, they are still the core facility, given all it does is determine the most probable answer in its outputs (I know I'm being reductive, some of the developments from AI are amazing). Whereas words should be the consequence of thoughts, lead to the development of thought, and distil ideas in a way you can act on. Much like job adverts should be the consequence of effective job analysis, rather than a polished word that lacks meaning. The greatest risk for me in recruitment isn't so much the answers AI offers, but that we become so reliant we forget to ask better questions. I've edited down the previous article, but if you're curious, you can see it here . September 2023 I’d commented about my hearing on a social media post on deafness. ‘Have you looked into these hearing aids - they’re designed to overcome head shadow’, came the impromptu reply from a hearing aid specialist. Head shadow? Not a phrase I’d heard before, despite having no hearing on one side, which effectively creates a sound-free shadow to my right. See, when I had mumps at 18 months it killed the vestibulocochlear nerve in my right ear and damaged the one on the left. But it was my balance that showed the nursery assistants that something was wrong - I kept falling over for no reason. I expect they thought my slow response was normal naughty-boyness. Balance, intermittently poor audio processing, energy required to maintain attention in noisy environments and that bloody tinnitus - all these issues are far more annoying than not being able to hear in one ear. That and not being able to tell where sounds come from. “Over here, Greg!” is the most useless call on a football pitch. And the head shadow thing? Well, it’s never been an issue - I just turn my head when in conversation. It might look like I’m turning to kiss you, but it’s just a conversation I want honest. Sure I miss out on certain audio cues, but it’s rarely an issue. Anyway, curious as I am I looked into the £4,000 hearing aid that solves head shadow by placing a microphone on the deaf ear and projecting it into the the good ear. Quite the brute force tech solution and one I’m sure some benefit from. But the key issue is one of reverb. While the product is good, it would impact the quality of sound in my good ear, which seems a pointless trade-off for me, when my process of life is more effective than shiny tech. It’s ironic that I consider myself highly excitable when it comes to technology developments, yet I’m never an early adopter. Because I always ask myself, other than giddiness, what problems does this solve and how will it enhance my life. And so it is for AI in recruitment, and the shininess of tech in general. They are positioned as solving problems, and indeed they do, but in many cases, it’s the wrong problem that detracts us from the real opportunities for better processes. Simpler administration, speed and scale are clear benefits. And some of these AI-branded automations are excellent. The Star Trek-style auto-translator makes me giddy. As does the sales bot conversation-as-a-human sales video that’s doing the rounds. But AI for writing? What problem does that solve? For me, it depends on what you consider sales to be. Is sales pitching a generic message and hoping someone will bite? Or is sales laying out the facts so that the right person can reach an objective decision? A decision which might mean getting in touch, or changing their view on what needs recruiting. For the former AI writing seems to solve a problem. The words are certainly better, but the message is even worse. Yes: prompting. But if you can prompt the right message, why aren’t you just writing it, so that you embed that knowledge for use across other mediums - conversations, meetings and so on? While AI writing does not meet the requirements for the second type of sales. You can only do this by establishing the right facts from a briefing, consultation or interview. Then interpret this with meaning to the right people so that it creates the right impact. Sales as data visualisation, if you will. And if AI doesn’t work for sales in this way, why would it work for content or marketing? I think the answer depends on whether you value contextual insight or not. Until AI is better at asking questions that create meaningful conversation, it’s a non-starter for me. I say until because this hesitation will be moot in the next year or so. Because it isn’t what AI is now that’s the opportunity - it’s what’s coming soon. I can’t wait to see what’s next. Until then, AI, for writing, is a question of in one ear and out of the other. Which, if you’re deaf in the one, is quite the problem. Go learn copywriting instead, and listen to how it transforms your approach to recruitment. Then layer tech on top, when it’s ready. Thanks for reading. Regards, Greg p.s. If you like good recruitment and you need help with it in the UK, drop me a line. DM on LinkedIn, email greg.wyatt@bwrecruitment.co.uk , whichever you prefer.
By Greg Wyatt • November 4, 2026
If you ever thought 'outcome-led' was a pretentious headline for a recruiter, it's also how you should think about your job search. Welcome to the 50th edition of Jobseeker Basics. As well as sharing advice that - hopefully - helps you navigate our mercurial jobs market more easily, there's always been a separate utility to these newsletters. I use them to update chapters in A Career Breakdown Kit , so that I can ensure it is always as current as possible. People who've bought the Kindle edition will get an automatic update when the 2027 edition is released in January/February. Paperback owners are invited to contact me for a free digital update. For this newsletter, I've tightened some of the language around accepting job offers - pretty boring update, but maybe necessary for fringe cases. I often talk about outcome-led recruitment. While it might sound pretentious there's a simple reason, which underpins everything I do. Begin with the ending, work back and find the right path. In recruitment this means flashing forward 12 months. What did a successful hire look like? What problems did they solve? What separated excellent from good from adequate from inadequate? What were the outcomes you needed for it to have been a successful hire? Nail these points down and you work backwards. What good actually looks like in viable candidate profiles. What needs to be communicated to them to encourage them to take a step forwards. How we find them - whether in a headhunt, an advert, networking or other. I also talk a lot about why a job search should be the inverse of how that vacancy might be filled. And so it is that the outcome you want in your job search should inform your strategy to find that job. Ironically, On Job Offers is Chapter 31 in A Career Breakdown Kit, slap bang in the middle of the book on page 162. With good reason, given you may find yourself needing to look for work again in future, sometimes by choice and sometimes by the other. All the more reason to have a strategy you can replicate and improve on, time and time again: 31 - On job offers At some point you’re going to get a job offer. It’s helpful to be clear on what this should look like at the start of your job search. Because, if you don’t know your destination, how can you be sure which path to take? Here are the main points to consider. Identity At the start of any job search, remind yourself of your career identity. This may be at the point of an unexpected redundancy, when you’ve decided your current job is no longer right, or if a recruiter contacts you out of the blue with a compelling proposition. Try this once a year, even when gainfully employed, because it’s easy for the path of employment to diverge from where you want your career to go. What is your current context, personally, with family, in life? What do you need and how does work reflect this? What are your core values? The ones that underpin who you are and who you want to see in the mirror. How does work reflect this? What are the things you enjoy, are neutral about, or dislike in your career? What does this look like in your current job? How has your employer changed in the past year? How has the world changed? How does this reflect you as a person? Who do you want to be as a person, family member, friend and peer? What impact do you want to make? How much do you need to earn and by when? These answers aren’t fixed and can change quickly with a change in circumstance, as you change over time, or for reasons out of your control. Clarify what you want and what you need, and therefore what this looks like in your next job. This identity informs your job search strategy, part of which is the roles you go for, part of which is the approach you take, and part of which is what an acceptable job offer is. Total compensation & opportunity cost It's common to see salary as the most important factor in a job offer negotiation. It's better to look at negotiating total compensation and opportunity cost. Total compensation is the overall financial value of a role. It includes: Salary Pension contribution Bonus Commission Car allowance RSUs Some benefits are salary sacrificed or tax efficient - their value goes beyond what they appear on paper. A great pension scheme will save you 20% or 40% on tax payments in the UK across the salary invested. It might even, at a higher salary level, improve access to child benefits. On the other hand, opportunity cost is the consequence of taking an offer, compared to what you might have if you stayed. For example: Moving to a three-day hybrid, compared to full remote. What's the cost of mileage or time commuting? What's the cost of heating your home when fully remote? Or - a role that offers more money now, with no progression in future. Compared to a role that pays less now, and will leapfrog in future, while giving you skills that support career growth. Are these contractual and likely to happen, or are they empty promises? Look for evidence such as a track record with other employees. It's entirely possible to accept an offer with a higher salary and find yourself worse off with take home pay. Establish all the financial implications of an offer. Impact Impact goes both ways. The impact you can have in your new role, and the impact your new role will have on you. A high paying job that takes you away from a young family might be a solution or a problem. A brilliant job that’s an unsustainable commute won’t work long term. Does that matter to you? A well paid job that gives you a good balance at home yet will only be a cog in a machine - a dream for some, unfulfilling for others. Impact also includes trajectory. Are you someone who wants to do the same job over time, in a structured way? Someone who wants regular advancement and career development? Both, and others are fine. Make sure you know what you are getting yourself into. Culture & People It’s at least partly true that people leave bosses, not jobs. While decent people can become bad bosses for various reasons, some of which relate to the environment they manage within. The problem is that people are on their best behaviour in interview processes, while culture as it’s pitched doesn’t always reflect the culture experienced. The interview process should be there for you to gather facts as much as possible. Do your research to get a sense of a company’s values, principles, how it treats its people, and all those other elements that will affect a career with them. This is research to be done at interview stage or before. Ikigai (with a little i) A wonderful Japanese concept. In its original form it means ‘what you get out of bed for’ or ‘those small moments we take pleasure in.’ Rather than the westernised Venn Purpose Diagram many are familiar with as Ikigai (with a big I). If you ask people in Japan what they think of Ikigai they may well say something along the lines of ‘huuunnhh?’ ikigai is a helpful principle when considering a job offer. It’s those qualities unique to you (often defined by your career identity) that you take pleasure in, while others around you may not get it. Sometimes this is gut instinct. Important to listen to, important to challenge. It’s at least part of your decision in a job offer. Even if everything else might be just alright, ikigai in your offered job might be good reason to take it. Or it might be the company’s purpose and what they are doing to improve the world. ikigai is unique to you and it makes everything better if you can find it. Those are the key points to look at if given a job offer. There’s no right or wrong, only right for you and the people you support. Negotiating salary There are a lot of moving parts in any salary negotiation, both at your end and with the employer. There are two main elements. The first is your place in the market - do what you can to find the range of fair pay available to you right now. The second is compensation philosophy - how do companies reach an offer? Both come down to asking questions and research. Assume nothing. I would err on the side of boldness in a salary negotiation. At final interview stage, I’d ask for the top end, based on what I’ve learnt - if they see me as the best candidate, why wouldn’t I? If they offer a little lower than I expect, I’d be positive about it and ask what else they can do to improve their offer. It’s unlikely you’ll lose out on an offer by being clear and respectful. If you want to drill deep into negotiations, I recommend reading Never Split the Difference by Chris Voss. His advice on deep listening, calibrated questions and price anchors are directly relevant to salary negotiation. Negotiating is highly contextual, so you should be careful if following opinion-led advice on what works for that individual. After the offer As with a salary negotiation, the post offer process and run up to employment is different from employer to employer. You can indicate that you're happy to proceed and ask the employer to issue the formal paperwork. Be aware that accepting an offer, even verbally, can create a legally binding contract. If you're not ready to commit, make that clear and reserve your formal acceptance until you've reviewed the written terms. In practice, the legal risk of withdrawing before starting is generally low. Most employers will have little commercial interest in pursuing someone who no longer wishes to join, particularly where they have suffered no demonstrable loss. However, contractual obligations and reputational consequences are worth considering. Treat the Offer Letter as a formal proof of your new employer’s offer of employment. If something isn’t right with the Letter, ask the employer for clarification. Once you've accepted the offer, signed and returned the letter, and any conditions have been satisfied, you can resign and agree a start date with your new employer. Aim to understand their onboarding process. Is there anything helpful you can do before your start date? Make sure you know when, where and any arrival instructions for your first day. As for your wider job search - you should withdraw from other applications when you formally accept an offer. It’s your choice whether you keep your cards close to your chest, accepting a suitable offer with the prospect of something better coming up. You can cross that bridge if you come to it. While this is not something I recommend, a tough job search is as good a time as any to look after number one.