How to interview, pt 1

Greg Wyatt • May 14, 2026

Tomorrow at 1pm BST, Simon Ward and I navigate how to interview, in our LinkedIn Live. You can join us or view the recording here: The Interview Edition.

Interviews are a key area of anxiety in a tough job search - for good reason. If you've been struggling to convert applications or enquiries into interviews, the interview itself may seem an achievement. Yet for the employer, it's the 2nd step of many in their assessment process.

The assumption that you can get the job if you nail the interview can be a heavy load to carry, so it's only natural that you'll do what you can to actually nail it.

Yet, when I look at interview advice online, it's invariably of the J0b s3arch haxxor variety - whether it's killer questions you should ask at the end, the secret tricks of body language or other esoteric arts that seem to make a difference.

The irony is though that, even if there is truth to them, they are palliative rather than strategic.

Because if that's what you're relying on to change the outcome, you've missed opportunities that are in your control.

Foundational opportunities that lead to better outcome, some of which may seem unrelated to how you are on the day, while being central to better performance.

What follows is Chapter 46 in A Career Breakdown Kit (2026). You can buy it for an always-current guide to navigating your jobs market - or you can read all the chapters for free here.

It's the first in a 4 part series, but next week's Chapter is on the conflicting mess of advice and how you can unpick opinion from steps that helps you.

46 - Interview preparation

 

I see a lot of advice on how to perform well at interview.

Typically, it relates to STAR (situation task action results), CARL (context action results learning) or another derivation of this storytelling framework.

However this advice typically stands on its own and can set you adrift if you don’t have the right anchor:

Preparation.

The what and why of interviews

The goal of any constructive interview process is to understand

  • How a candidate will perform in a role,
  • What they will be like to work with
  • How likely they are to stick around long enough for the employer to see a suitable return on investment

And to compare each candidate against the vacancy requirements to identify the best hire.

Every employer has different priorities in assessing these points, different ways of conducting interviews and different strategies for how the process is run.

The problem is that it’s hard to tell what to expect when all initial communications are similar.

Transparency helps and is a great way to build trust yet few employers do this well.

If you were to know in advance that you are one of 25 people being screened by a panel on Teams, how would that affect your preparation compared to being one of 3?

Gaining insight into the what and why of any interview process should inform your strategy.

Typically, employers won’t include agency interviews as part of their interview process. I’m sure you might.

An employer might feel they only do a 2-stage process that is efficient. Your experience might look like this:

  • Application to agency advert
  • Registration with agency
  • Agency screening
  • Qualification call with TA Advisor at employer
  • Numerical and verbal reasoning test
  • 1st interview with hiring manager
  • 2nd interview stage comprising 4 separate calls with stakeholders around the world
  • Psychometrics
  • Quick chat with the CEO
  • Debrief with the hiring manager?

A former client who shut up shop in the UK a few years back regularly used to run 7 or 8 interview stages. Is it a surprise that they are a good company to work for?

The goals of interviewers

A legitimate interview process aims to appoint the most suitable candidate.

That isn’t necessarily the goal of any individual interview or interviewer.

Goals can be dictated by a number of elements such as number of candidates or differing views of stakeholders.

These goals can be anything from:

  • Checking broad suitability before progressing to decision makers
  • Looking for reasons to discount candidates from a volume process
  • Wanting to look credible to higher-ups in who is presented
  • Assessing cultural fit or technical capability
  • Investigating concerns or doubts
  • Confirming a decision

Interviews can also move from recruitment and selection to recruitment and elimination the closer you get to the end of a process.

This is particularly the case if candidates are close in overall capability - if you can’t find a clear reason to offer one candidate are there any reasons you can discount instead?

This is one reason why industry knowledge can become a problem at final stage when it wasn’t earlier.

Given there is such a huge variety in interview philosophy, purpose, strategy, process and execution, it can be tempting to second guess everything and overcomplicate your part in it.

I’d go the other way and simplify it to what you can control.

Interviews are your opportunity to show the employer why you are interested in them, how you will contribute, how you will solve their problems, and what you are like in a professional setting.

Put your best foot forward in a way that is professionally authentic and let the rest take care of itself.

Why do you interview?

Interviews can and should be a two-way process that gives you transparent information and enables an objective decision about whether this vacancy is the right move.

Interviews aren’t always though, are they?

You might think that getting the job is your goal.

The real reason to interview is to establish as early as possible every non-negotiable reason why you shouldn’t take the job.

This means you do what you can to be the candidate of choice for the right reasons, and if there are no insurmountable problems at the end of the process you can accept the offer put forward.

You want to be able to be the person who says no if you have to rather than have them say no for you.

How you can prepare with these in mind

There are six types of preparation you can do for an interview.

The first two are ongoing preparations that serve every interview process.

The rest are mainly application specific.

1. Ensure you portray yourself in a way that has meaning to the interviewer

One pitfall in recruitment, whether you are a job seeker or employer, is the valuable information you have trapped in your head that will help the other see you as a viable match.

We aren’t mind readers. How can you give meaning about why you are a great candidate?

Read through Principles of a Good CV again.

Not because you should repeat your CV verbatim. It’s a distillation of your candidacy written for the reader. A reminder of how you can help.

You should be an expert on yourself who can draw on your achievements readily.

Get a friend to ask you questions on your CV, someone who isn’t an expert in your domain, and see how they react to your answers.

While you might hope interviewers have technical insight in your areas of specialism you will inevitably come across people in the process who aren’t.

An HR practitioner may be involved as a steward for their culture and to ensure you are interviewed fairly - should you expect them to understand jargon? And how might that work against you?

If you are fortunate enough to get interviews regularly, you can treat these as both practice and the real thing. Watch how interviewers respond to what you say and reflect on it afterwards. How can you give better meaning?

Interviewing is a skill you can sharpen over the course of your job search.

This is prep you should do before any interview. An anchor to your candidacy and a reminder of why you can be great at what you do.

2. Keep abreast of general industry and professional news related to your work

For anyone interested in continuous professional development, this should be a natural endeavour.

Yet it’s easy to fall into the trap of not doing so when you are between jobs or busy with other priorities.

Given how what’s going on in the near-outside world of your profession impacts your profession, I recommend you take some time every week to keep updated.

It may even help with interviewing showing the currency of your expertise.

3. The company, its people, its offering, its industry and its market

One of the pillars of negotiation is to gain as full an understanding of the situation as possible.

If you want to negotiate a successful interview, one where you’re seen as the right candidate, doing this is an advantage.

There are many resources available:

  • Their website
  • Their other vacancies
  • Their industry news
  • Media relations
  • YouTube
  • Endole / TechCrunch
  • Local resources. For example, Cambridge Network and Business Weekly (which is about the Cambridge tech scene)
  • LinkedIn to get a feel for their organisational structure
  • LinkedIn for information on the interviewers (why not connect and say hi)
  • LinkedIn for their content, which might give hidden insight to their attitudes
  • LinkedIn for past employees (what can they tell you?)
  • Glassdoor / Indeed / Trustpilot / Google reviews - what do trends say about customer and candidate experiences?

Every industry and company will have their own priorities in an interview - keep this in mind, particularly if you’re transitioning into a new domain.

Someone with only private sector experience might be surprised by the needs of a civil service recruitment process. Information is often available to help you prepare.

4. Give the interview what it needs

Every interview has its own priority some of which will articulate the part you should play.

If you want to stay in a legitimate interview process, give the employer what they ask for.

You may think presentations, on-site meetings, psychometrics, etc are worthless. If they are non-negotiable for the employer they are a requirement to fulfil.

You don’t have to play the game; if you choose to, play to win.

5. How you can deliver on the role requirements

Analyse what you can of their role against the achievements you have, problems you’ve solved and outcomes you’ve reached - in reflection of their needs.

It’s worth qualifying this in the interview itself to allow you to tailor your answers.

While this is role-specific preparation, it is also related to the first point above - the answers are within.

 

6. Why you want the job, or at least to work at the company

I expect most people who’ve been out of work for a while simply want a way to make ends meet.

Yet I wouldn’t recommend using this as an answer at an interview.

Many employers have an inclination to candidates who have reason to want to work for them specifically.

Take time to understand your reasons that relate to the job or company. What about them appeals to you?

This is the answer to give.

If the only reason you’re applying is because it is a job, how can you truthfully frame your answer to make it about them?

‘I enjoy the role of a <job title> especially around <essential requirements>‘ with examples from their job description - might be crude.

It is more effective than ‘I need to buy dinner on Friday’ no matter how true that is.

Your interest levels can be a deciding factor.


By Greg Wyatt June 11, 2026
What follows is Chapter 43 from A Career Breakdown Kit. Is it a magic salve guaranteed for success? No of course not. But much like anything in a job search, nothing is guaranteed. What we do is identify which avenues can be effective for your context, and form an appropriate strategy. LinkedIn optimisation is great if people search for you on LinkedIn. Except speaking to my recruitment peers, fewer and fewer rely on it. Would it surprise you if I told you I rarely invested in at all before 2019? I've been working in recruitment since 1996 including at CEO level. Applications, networking, referrals, content, CV databases. All have a place and a purpose. Doorknocking on the other hand - some would tell you it has no place in the modern job search. If my daughter*, her friends and other 18 year olds can get a job from an old school technique, while those employers say "only through Indeed" then that might be a hint it still works. Some of whom are socially anxious, but then it's a replicable process, not a cult of personality. Or the periodic messages I get from CxOs who made their own jobs from direct outreach. Not forgetting Granovetter's seminal research and recent LinkedIn-specific studies in Science journal showing weak ties drive more job mobility than strong ties. And why wouldn't doorknocking work on LinkedIn, when you have a weak tie that suggests a viable employer? But no, it's not a guarantee. It's just an arrow in the quiver of a multichannel job search. 43 - How to doorknock Doorknocking is an old-school sales approach you may well have experienced, such as when a salesperson with a clipboard rings your doorbell and asks you to change electricity provider. My wife even once bought from exactly this scenario. While it’s not uncommon in a business-to-consumer situation it can also work business-to-business… if you can get past security. Although technology has moved on, the principle is the same whether in person, by phone, email, letter or LinkedIn: You approach someone cold and create your own opportunity. This isn’t an approach for everyone and requires chutzpah. If you are used to a high failure rate in applications - what do you have to lose by being proactive? More than that - look at all the advice on LinkedIn on how to improve your odds in a job search. It’s all transactional and applicable, available to everyone - if you all follow it, everyone takes the same step forward. While taking steps others are less prepared to do means the approach alone may stand out. If you encounter the equivalent of a sign which says, ‘Trespassers will be shot!’, pay attention. My own career of looking for work includes many non-transactional approaches: Walked into the local Cinema and asked for a job Walked into Office World and asked for a job Worked for Dad Talked to one of my ex-colleagues and gained some by-the-call phone research work Temped through an agency Walked into an Inn and asked for a job Referred to a publishing, training & consulting company In managing their small-scale recruitment alongside my day job I got to know the MD of a recruitment firm as a supplier. I went to work there Tapped up to return to a more senior role Started my business upon being given the boot - thanks Dave! It’s true I did apply through job boards and agencies. It’s mainly through my own means that I have secured my employment. *My daughter even tried doorknocking for her first job in our local town last summer. It didn’t work for her - she found a nice retail job through an application on Indeed. Her experience was positive enough that she helped a friend do the same - who got a job at the first shop they tried. Doorknocking is about approaching companies by category not because they are recruiting. These categories can be: All the employers in your local business park (often they have websites, with directories and job adverts) Companies listed in local newspapers, directories or platforms (local to me this could be Cambridge Evening News, Bury Free Press, Cambridge Network or Business Weekly) Top 100 employers in your domain Companies that have recently had funding and are about to scale Doorknocking companies you’ve come across through networking and its resulting market map Make contact and make a case for yourself on the principle of the right person, right time, right place, right message, right offer, and right price. There’s an element of luck involved for these elements to all come together. A disadvantage is that they may not be recruiting or ever have a need to employ you and even if they do have a vacancy, you still have to establish the right fit. That means a logically low hit rate. Your threshold for an acceptable failure rate will inform whether this is the right approach for you. The difference is the anonymous rejection of a volume-based application versus the ‘personal rejection’ from your direct outbound approach. Right person, right time, right place, right message, right offer, and right price. Let’s reorder and examine this marketing principle: Right Place Those Categories above. The place is the Company, and how you contact them. You can go in blind if you are a bold prospector or research them in advance. ‘site:’ is a useful command in Google. You can search on specific websites: ‘site: linkedin.com ACME jobs’ Right Person Typically this will be the ‘next one up’ - Head of department, Director, CxO or Owner. Who would be the budget holder at work? Those are prospects. Look them up on LinkedIn, PR, news, video platforms. What can you find out? Right Time While time can be happenstance, can timed factors create opportunity? What might be a hiring trigger? Perhaps you could contact a list of companies that have recently announced funding or a big win - news that may lead to hiring additional people. Or maybe you hear through the grapevine that Janine is about to go off on maternity leave. If their process isn’t time-bound, can you make it time-bound? ‘We aren’t hiring right now’ might mean they’ve run out of headcount in the January to June period and may have a new budget in July. What can you learn that helps you both? If you have radio silence, why not try again in a month or three months? Think about how you buy. If you don’t need something how likely are you to respond to a message no matter how well crafted? If you do need something you might think first of someone who keeps in regular touch. Right Offer You have more opportunity for career creativity in being unemployed than someone entrenched in a 9 to 5 permanent job. What problems can you fix for a company in a non-traditional employment capacity? Let’s say an employer has a problem that needs fixing. They don’t have capacity to do it right now. It isn’t burning enough to seek professional help and there isn’t sufficient work in view to make it a job. What if you caught them at the right time? An out-of-work TA Manager who offered to revamp an onboarding process. A web designer who notes lots of issues with their website. A strategic operational issue that is their unknown unknown identified by your expertise. A swamped team that could benefit from their admin burden being reduced. An orchard that needs pickers at harvest time. What starts out as a short-term, project, or part-time piece of work can become proof of concept. While rare, I know a few people whose permanent full-time jobs have come about this way, including at a senior level. Right message This is both specific and crude. It’s specific because nailing the message CAN create an opportunity a poorly written message may miss. It’s crude because sometimes you can catch people at the right time, no matter how cruddy your message is. This is the case in recruitment - I’ve picked up several senior appointments by calling at the right time. ‘I’m glad you called Greg, I’m starting to think about my maternity cover in June.’ Had I not called, that HR Director may well have gone to the specialist HR recruiters she is also in touch with. If you have a strong hook in your message - such as a key area of rare expertise or a clear issue you’ve identified which companies may have - go in with that. If you don’t - done is better than procrastinating: ‘Hi Greg, I live locally to Bircham Wyatt Recruitment. Love what you do. I wondered if you might be recruiting for an apple picker at any point. If you can’t help, could you point me in the right direction?’ Right price I’ve left this until the end because much of this is variable and subjective. What are your needs? What can they afford? What does the market say? How flexible can you be? Research will help if you can get a sense of what they generally pay through Indeed, Glassdoor or others. Or maybe what comparable companies that are advertising will pay. One approach might be to pro-rate your salary over the period you’ll work there. Doorknocking can sometimes give you access to jobs that are being actively recruited. It’s a happy byproduct of your work, if you find yourself in this situation. It’s worth persevering. Otherwise, it’s too easy to think after 10, 20, or 100 unsuccessful efforts that the approach itself is at fault. There is always an element of luck in any activity. This may be out of your comfort zone, in which case it’s an opportunity to grow. The only certain thing is that if you don’t try you definitely won’t benefit.
By Greg Wyatt June 4, 2026
Listening to the consequences of your recruitment process is an opportunity. I do find it interesting go through my older articles. How has my thinking changed? Has it improved? How was I so cringy? Looking at this article in its August 2023 form, I hadn't yet focused on Candidate Resentment as an opportunity to improve how we recruit. Not because it's decent to treat people better, but because that is a happy byproduct of strategically assessing our work as it supports our goals. Whether that's filling vacancies or finding people that meet our goals long-term and flourish doing so. Root canal If you recognise that speaking to the potential problems of the people you want to engage is a good idea, you may also recognise why you shouldn't create any problems that push them away. Engagement is an ongoing process that carries through every stage of recruitment, even into employment. Yes, bring your candidates forward, in part by showing how you solve their career problems. But, don’t throw up unnecessary issues that undo your good work. Listening to the consequences of your recruitment process is an opportunity. Why did that candidate proceed? Why did another withdraw? What raised concern? What about the potential candidates we don’t even know about? What influenced their decisions? I’ve spoken to tens of thousands of candidates, prospects, applicants, and everything else, during my career. Out of curiosity, I’m always interested in what influences their decisions in their pursuit of a new career. What fascinates me is that these are the Gemba , the unknown unknowns that we can extrapolate into our own recruitment processes. What problems do they encounter elsewhere, that discourage them from applying, that encourage them to withdraw, and why? And how might we be guilty of the same? While if we are guilty, how can we fix these problems, so that the objection never comes up? Imagine that - the reader that might have walked away, who instead chooses to engage. This may seem an unknowable unknown, but one of the benefits of my job seeker work is hearing about the issues they encounter on their side of recruitment and how that may influence their decisions. Considering these are people that are very problem aware, their appetite for bullshit is in some ways higher than the problem unaware (passive in old speak). While in others, what you may consider normal behaviour, they consider red flags. While we can’t control the behaviour of candidates, we can learn what influences their behaviour and form a process that nudges, draws forward or mitigates when needed. What are we accountable for that might present a problem for a candidate we want to employ? Especially when, in normal life, moving jobs is one of the biggest stresses? How might we unnecessarily cause scepticism or anxiety? Auditing your own recruitment process as a mystery candidate is one opportunity. As is surveying your staff for their experience - with the caveat they are happy to be working for you, skewing their perception. Or perhaps they're terrified of losing their jobs. Do they really want to rock the boat with criticism? But it’s the candidates who withdraw, who hesitate, who object that can be the source of the biggest improvements. What would you say their common complaints are? You can look to LinkedIn for the answer, in their high-engagement posts. Salary on the job description (they mean the advert) ATS data duplication Responsiveness and transparency Tardy, bloated and unnecessary recruitment stages A robotic process that forgot they are human Which becomes your choice. Do you look within and challenge yourself with 5 Whys to see how you can improve? Do you take away problems before they can occur? Saving your candidates unnecessary toothache? Or do you lay blame on the areas you can’t control? Those are the questions. Regards, Greg p.s. I’m available for interesting work - UK key hires, fractional talent acquisition and recruitment writing. Maybe we can talk. p.p.s. A Recruitment AiDE is out now - the discipline for UK key hire recruitment