Y/our. A recruitment AiDE, pt 10

Greg Wyatt • January 8, 2026

Happy New Year!


What follows is about putting ikigai in practice, and how what fulfils your people can also attract capable new hires.


Does your team say this to their friends in the pub when asked how their job is going?


"I'm passionate and excited about working for a progressive market-leading employer of choice."


Not unless the brainwashing has gone well, I'd wager.


May, 2023


Why do your people enjoy working for you?


Why might others leave great jobs to work for you?


Why would they stick around?


Share the answers to these questions, with meaning, in your messaging, and you’ll attract better-suited candidates if they aren’t ready to apply.


Offer them an appealing reason to take their first step – which might simply be a conversation.


While ‘apply now’ can be your first experience of an applicant, it may not be their first experience of your process, especially if their CV is outdated or they hadn’t been considering a move.


What will encourage further consideration, perhaps an application, a 2nd interview, accepting a job offer, declining a counteroffer, or starting a job successfully?


That final step doesn’t happen without the first, and all those in-between.


A first step that may not happen, if you haven’t given good enough reason to do so.


It’s all very well grabbing attention, but why should anyone seriously consider engaging with you?


Fail to do the latter, and you’re left with clickbait.


That’s what ikigai is for.


It can be found in every touchpoint in your process and it’s closely tied to the experience of your candidate.


For now, let’s focus on attraction.


Many employers have a kernel of truth about why they are a great place to work.


But it slips away when they start describing that truth because they focus on what it means for them.


Our company. Our culture. Our values. Our vacancy. Our needs.


That’s no advert. It’s a boast.


Most adverts lead with company info first, presumably for promotion purposes, yet why should a candidate care?


If it matters, show why.


If it doesn’t, strip it out.


“We’re a high-growth market leader”


You’re growing through acquisition?


Growing because the world demands a sustainable product only you can provide, creating opportunities for career development?


Growing because you work your team really hard, and pay them through the nose to compensate?


Get to the root of your statement to give meaning.


“We’re innovative and disruptive.”


So is every other company. What does it mean and why does it matter?


If there’s no benefit for the candidate, will they care to read about your company? And if they don’t, why are you writing about it?


Values are a great example of truth being lost in words.


“We value honesty, fairness and respect”


Ah, so you don’t hire narcissistic criminals?


I’m pretty sure most people believe they fulfil these, even if they don’t, because they read it from their perspective.


Words that are both universal and ambiguous, letting readers find their own meaning: it might mean “we make fact-based decisions, based on impartial research, and no BS” or it might mean “we work openly and toward a common goal, we have each other’s backs, without politics.


What is the story of your personal values?


Learning from success and failure, giving the world more than I take, and helping others improve their lot - a few of the things I aspire to, even when I get them hideously wrong 🤣.


If your perfect candidate is fed up with the corporate rat race and wants to contribute their experience in a more meaningful way, with honesty, fairness and respect… isn’t that something to appeal to?


Culture is often described from intent, not from the experience of performing a role in a team.



“We have a brilliant culture of learning, teamwork, and bringing people forward”


But what does Alan in Accounts experience or Mandy in Marketing? Harry in HR?


Alan at one company might love the quiet time he spends with Excel.


Another Alan might help his manufacturing leadership team make better decisions by establishing cost variances.


How are they brought forward?


Mandy may be thrilled by automation, or maybe she’s totally into creativity.


What does teamwork look like for them?


Harry might find delight in telling agencies to PSL off, or perhaps he wants to make a difference and not be trapped by firefighting ER issues.


What part does HR have to play in a culture of learning?


All might fit into a single definition of culture while being very different candidates, experiencing their roles very differently.


Some who would make great hires, and some who are great people yet not the right employees.


What does the culture of your vacancy mean to the right candidates?


Maybe candidates don’t care if your culture is toxic, they just want money for their habits.


Flexi-time to care for the horses.


Working from home because they’re better team players when they don’t have to hang around humans.


Working from the office because that’s how ideas are inspired.


Joining a friendly team who all like crochet.


Knowing that their professional development will be invested in.


Earning money to pay the bills, because work is just a transaction.


Everyone’s different.


So talking about you, as an employer, makes much less sense than appealing to their needs, inclusively, in the way your vacancy inherently offers.


Culture, values, pay, working arrangements, career development, commute – what matters to them, and why.


What you can offer that meets their ikigai.


Why not spend time with your teams and find out what their roles are really like, what makes them tick, and what frustrates them?


If they genuinely want a career with you, might it be that their ikigai is the same as those you want to attract?


Look at why people leave your business. Is it because their new roles are actually better, or is it because you no longer meet their needs?


Is that something you can change, have everyone benefit from, and show a new attraction point to candidates?


What makes your ideal candidates tick? If you’ve established what good is, in your candidates, you should also have established what motivates them.


How can you make their life better?


What problem does working for you solve?


Why not give them a good reason to start a conversation with you, by distilling the ikigai you can offer into a simple concept or two that makes them want to learn more?


Just be mindful if you notice homogeneity in your team - a lack of diversity can hold you back, in which case the right question to ask is


"How can I access a wider talent pool?"


The next post is about how you can provide ikigai to candidates at every step in your process, and how it can benefit you.


Regards,

Greg


p.s. While you are here, if you like the idea of improving how you recruit, lack capacity or need better candidates, and are curious how I can help, these are my services:


- UK key hire recruitment (available for no more than two vacancies)

- manage part or all of your recruitment on an individually designed basis for one client

- outplacement support


Just hit reply to check if my approach is right for you.


By Greg Wyatt June 11, 2026
What follows is Chapter 43 from A Career Breakdown Kit. Is it a magic salve guaranteed for success? No of course not. But much like anything in a job search, nothing is guaranteed. What we do is identify which avenues can be effective for your context, and form an appropriate strategy. LinkedIn optimisation is great if people search for you on LinkedIn. Except speaking to my recruitment peers, fewer and fewer rely on it. Would it surprise you if I told you I rarely invested in at all before 2019? I've been working in recruitment since 1996 including at CEO level. Applications, networking, referrals, content, CV databases. All have a place and a purpose. Doorknocking on the other hand - some would tell you it has no place in the modern job search. If my daughter*, her friends and other 18 year olds can get a job from an old school technique, while those employers say "only through Indeed" then that might be a hint it still works. Some of whom are socially anxious, but then it's a replicable process, not a cult of personality. Or the periodic messages I get from CxOs who made their own jobs from direct outreach. Not forgetting Granovetter's seminal research and recent LinkedIn-specific studies in Science journal showing weak ties drive more job mobility than strong ties. And why wouldn't doorknocking work on LinkedIn, when you have a weak tie that suggests a viable employer? But no, it's not a guarantee. It's just an arrow in the quiver of a multichannel job search. 43 - How to doorknock Doorknocking is an old-school sales approach you may well have experienced, such as when a salesperson with a clipboard rings your doorbell and asks you to change electricity provider. My wife even once bought from exactly this scenario. While it’s not uncommon in a business-to-consumer situation it can also work business-to-business… if you can get past security. Although technology has moved on, the principle is the same whether in person, by phone, email, letter or LinkedIn: You approach someone cold and create your own opportunity. This isn’t an approach for everyone and requires chutzpah. If you are used to a high failure rate in applications - what do you have to lose by being proactive? More than that - look at all the advice on LinkedIn on how to improve your odds in a job search. It’s all transactional and applicable, available to everyone - if you all follow it, everyone takes the same step forward. While taking steps others are less prepared to do means the approach alone may stand out. If you encounter the equivalent of a sign which says, ‘Trespassers will be shot!’, pay attention. My own career of looking for work includes many non-transactional approaches: Walked into the local Cinema and asked for a job Walked into Office World and asked for a job Worked for Dad Talked to one of my ex-colleagues and gained some by-the-call phone research work Temped through an agency Walked into an Inn and asked for a job Referred to a publishing, training & consulting company In managing their small-scale recruitment alongside my day job I got to know the MD of a recruitment firm as a supplier. I went to work there Tapped up to return to a more senior role Started my business upon being given the boot - thanks Dave! It’s true I did apply through job boards and agencies. It’s mainly through my own means that I have secured my employment. *My daughter even tried doorknocking for her first job in our local town last summer. It didn’t work for her - she found a nice retail job through an application on Indeed. Her experience was positive enough that she helped a friend do the same - who got a job at the first shop they tried. Doorknocking is about approaching companies by category not because they are recruiting. These categories can be: All the employers in your local business park (often they have websites, with directories and job adverts) Companies listed in local newspapers, directories or platforms (local to me this could be Cambridge Evening News, Bury Free Press, Cambridge Network or Business Weekly) Top 100 employers in your domain Companies that have recently had funding and are about to scale Doorknocking companies you’ve come across through networking and its resulting market map Make contact and make a case for yourself on the principle of the right person, right time, right place, right message, right offer, and right price. There’s an element of luck involved for these elements to all come together. A disadvantage is that they may not be recruiting or ever have a need to employ you and even if they do have a vacancy, you still have to establish the right fit. That means a logically low hit rate. Your threshold for an acceptable failure rate will inform whether this is the right approach for you. The difference is the anonymous rejection of a volume-based application versus the ‘personal rejection’ from your direct outbound approach. Right person, right time, right place, right message, right offer, and right price. Let’s reorder and examine this marketing principle: Right Place Those Categories above. The place is the Company, and how you contact them. You can go in blind if you are a bold prospector or research them in advance. ‘site:’ is a useful command in Google. You can search on specific websites: ‘site: linkedin.com ACME jobs’ Right Person Typically this will be the ‘next one up’ - Head of department, Director, CxO or Owner. Who would be the budget holder at work? Those are prospects. Look them up on LinkedIn, PR, news, video platforms. What can you find out? Right Time While time can be happenstance, can timed factors create opportunity? What might be a hiring trigger? Perhaps you could contact a list of companies that have recently announced funding or a big win - news that may lead to hiring additional people. Or maybe you hear through the grapevine that Janine is about to go off on maternity leave. If their process isn’t time-bound, can you make it time-bound? ‘We aren’t hiring right now’ might mean they’ve run out of headcount in the January to June period and may have a new budget in July. What can you learn that helps you both? If you have radio silence, why not try again in a month or three months? Think about how you buy. If you don’t need something how likely are you to respond to a message no matter how well crafted? If you do need something you might think first of someone who keeps in regular touch. Right Offer You have more opportunity for career creativity in being unemployed than someone entrenched in a 9 to 5 permanent job. What problems can you fix for a company in a non-traditional employment capacity? Let’s say an employer has a problem that needs fixing. They don’t have capacity to do it right now. It isn’t burning enough to seek professional help and there isn’t sufficient work in view to make it a job. What if you caught them at the right time? An out-of-work TA Manager who offered to revamp an onboarding process. A web designer who notes lots of issues with their website. A strategic operational issue that is their unknown unknown identified by your expertise. A swamped team that could benefit from their admin burden being reduced. An orchard that needs pickers at harvest time. What starts out as a short-term, project, or part-time piece of work can become proof of concept. While rare, I know a few people whose permanent full-time jobs have come about this way, including at a senior level. Right message This is both specific and crude. It’s specific because nailing the message CAN create an opportunity a poorly written message may miss. It’s crude because sometimes you can catch people at the right time, no matter how cruddy your message is. This is the case in recruitment - I’ve picked up several senior appointments by calling at the right time. ‘I’m glad you called Greg, I’m starting to think about my maternity cover in June.’ Had I not called, that HR Director may well have gone to the specialist HR recruiters she is also in touch with. If you have a strong hook in your message - such as a key area of rare expertise or a clear issue you’ve identified which companies may have - go in with that. If you don’t - done is better than procrastinating: ‘Hi Greg, I live locally to Bircham Wyatt Recruitment. Love what you do. I wondered if you might be recruiting for an apple picker at any point. If you can’t help, could you point me in the right direction?’ Right price I’ve left this until the end because much of this is variable and subjective. What are your needs? What can they afford? What does the market say? How flexible can you be? Research will help if you can get a sense of what they generally pay through Indeed, Glassdoor or others. Or maybe what comparable companies that are advertising will pay. One approach might be to pro-rate your salary over the period you’ll work there. Doorknocking can sometimes give you access to jobs that are being actively recruited. It’s a happy byproduct of your work, if you find yourself in this situation. It’s worth persevering. Otherwise, it’s too easy to think after 10, 20, or 100 unsuccessful efforts that the approach itself is at fault. There is always an element of luck in any activity. This may be out of your comfort zone, in which case it’s an opportunity to grow. The only certain thing is that if you don’t try you definitely won’t benefit.
By Greg Wyatt June 4, 2026
Listening to the consequences of your recruitment process is an opportunity. I do find it interesting go through my older articles. How has my thinking changed? Has it improved? How was I so cringy? Looking at this article in its August 2023 form, I hadn't yet focused on Candidate Resentment as an opportunity to improve how we recruit. Not because it's decent to treat people better, but because that is a happy byproduct of strategically assessing our work as it supports our goals. Whether that's filling vacancies or finding people that meet our goals long-term and flourish doing so. Root canal If you recognise that speaking to the potential problems of the people you want to engage is a good idea, you may also recognise why you shouldn't create any problems that push them away. Engagement is an ongoing process that carries through every stage of recruitment, even into employment. Yes, bring your candidates forward, in part by showing how you solve their career problems. But, don’t throw up unnecessary issues that undo your good work. Listening to the consequences of your recruitment process is an opportunity. Why did that candidate proceed? Why did another withdraw? What raised concern? What about the potential candidates we don’t even know about? What influenced their decisions? I’ve spoken to tens of thousands of candidates, prospects, applicants, and everything else, during my career. Out of curiosity, I’m always interested in what influences their decisions in their pursuit of a new career. What fascinates me is that these are the Gemba , the unknown unknowns that we can extrapolate into our own recruitment processes. What problems do they encounter elsewhere, that discourage them from applying, that encourage them to withdraw, and why? And how might we be guilty of the same? While if we are guilty, how can we fix these problems, so that the objection never comes up? Imagine that - the reader that might have walked away, who instead chooses to engage. This may seem an unknowable unknown, but one of the benefits of my job seeker work is hearing about the issues they encounter on their side of recruitment and how that may influence their decisions. Considering these are people that are very problem aware, their appetite for bullshit is in some ways higher than the problem unaware (passive in old speak). While in others, what you may consider normal behaviour, they consider red flags. While we can’t control the behaviour of candidates, we can learn what influences their behaviour and form a process that nudges, draws forward or mitigates when needed. What are we accountable for that might present a problem for a candidate we want to employ? Especially when, in normal life, moving jobs is one of the biggest stresses? How might we unnecessarily cause scepticism or anxiety? Auditing your own recruitment process as a mystery candidate is one opportunity. As is surveying your staff for their experience - with the caveat they are happy to be working for you, skewing their perception. Or perhaps they're terrified of losing their jobs. Do they really want to rock the boat with criticism? But it’s the candidates who withdraw, who hesitate, who object that can be the source of the biggest improvements. What would you say their common complaints are? You can look to LinkedIn for the answer, in their high-engagement posts. Salary on the job description (they mean the advert) ATS data duplication Responsiveness and transparency Tardy, bloated and unnecessary recruitment stages A robotic process that forgot they are human Which becomes your choice. Do you look within and challenge yourself with 5 Whys to see how you can improve? Do you take away problems before they can occur? Saving your candidates unnecessary toothache? Or do you lay blame on the areas you can’t control? Those are the questions. Regards, Greg p.s. I’m available for interesting work - UK key hires, fractional talent acquisition and recruitment writing. Maybe we can talk. p.p.s. A Recruitment AiDE is out now - the discipline for UK key hire recruitment