Personal Branding, pt 3

Greg Wyatt • May 14, 2024

This is the final part of this mini-series.

If you want to write content that gets you closer to a job it has to support, contribute to and start conversations with the right people.

With that in mind, I’ve had a change of heart in this post.

I was going to share some content writers who I think nail personal branding; however, the problem is that all it does is reflect my own interests.

There is no one right way to write content on LinkedIn, and we all have different strengths and weaknesses, personalities and goals.

Some authors focus solely on thought leadership, some on selling, some on humour, some combining them in a variety of ways.

You can try and copy others, but isn’t it better to help you find your own rhythm, that works for you?

Today’s article is about these points:

  1. finding content writers who may inspire you, and using that as a catalyst for your own words

  2. the vulnerability of writing

  3. how and why to write a flair post that promotes you

  4. fine-tuning to form a habit

  5. what else?

If you are new to this newsletter, don’t forget to check out the archive, and Part 1& Part 2 of this mini-series.


  1. finding content writers who may inspire you, and using that as a catalyst for your own words

There are broadly two ways to find writers that can seed your ideas for content.

Firstly, if you’re thinking about writing on LinkedIn, you are presumably already reading content.

What inspires you? What do you enjoy reading? Which authors resonate with your career, your values, your goals and the problems you solve?

When you read their content, do you engage and comment? Do you connect with them? Do you ask them who they recommend as writers in your field?

Secondly , look within.

What are the key criteria you want to be known for in your career?

Maybe it’s procurement or your CIPD membership. React or agile. “5 Whys” or Gemba.

If these are areas that interest you, use the LinkedIn search bar to find posts on these topics.

  • Now filter the results by ‘Posts’ and ‘Sort by’ latest

Read through the results both for posts that interest you personally, and those that have high engagement (less likely on a niche topic).


When you’ve found inspiring content, what next?

One first step in content creation is to respond to these posts with your own ideas. Less ‘Agree’ and more how you might respond in a real-life conversation on this topic.

Replying to other people’s posts is a great way to find your voice, particularly if they reply to your comment.

Like any skill, writing takes practice, and comments are a low-profile way of developing your tone.

If a comment sparks interest from other readers, it can be a great concept to build on as a post in its own right.

The other benefit of this kind of niche content is that those who engage are likely to have similar interests to you.

Make sure to read other comments and see if there are more conversations to be had.

Check out their profiles - do their interests and values reflect yours?

Great people to connect with, then DM to continue the conversation. Check out their posting history which will be available on their profile - there may well be a lot of interesting content to absorb.

With conversation comes content. Ideas and discussion that grow are a great way to share your voice.

Here’s a suggestion for how you can do this in practice:

  • Look for 5 posts daily that interest you professionally - manually, using a search, or checking what your valuable connections are up to

  • Engage and comment on each

  • Check out new authors’ profile - connect and follow their content, if you like what you see

  • On each post, look at who is engaging, and respond naturally.

  • Try to connect with 5 new relevant people from these interactions

  • Perhaps follow up with a message continuing the conversation

  • Take note of the most interesting conversations, and at the end of the week pick at least one to try and write your own posts

  • You don’t need to publish them if you aren’t comfortable - save for later if not

Personally, I’d avoid the viral content that combines relevance + relatability + entitlement + readability. These writers mainly aren’t interested in your engagement specifically, just the numbers.

You can see the truth of their words in how they respond in the comments sections.


  1. the vulnerability of writing


You can be a content creator without ever publishing a post, if you continue conversations through comments, connections, DMs and real-life comms.

This avoids sticking your head above the parapets, and is low risk, but misses the gain of publishing your own content.

I know that some people are held back for fear of failure, and I can tell you that clicking “send” is always a high point of anxiety for me in sending these newsletters.

What’s the worst that can happen with a carefully thought-out post?

Tumbleweed ?

If no one reads it, you can always try that post again later.

Disagreement ?

Loads of people disagree on my posts - you’ll see from my comments, that I am always constructive in my dialogue and typically this supports the intent of my post.

Everyone has an opinion, and they are welcome to theirs - as long as it’s constructive there’s always a learning opportunity.

Trolls ?

These people exist and will at some point rear their ugly heads. I imagine them naked on the Underground, which takes the sting out of their vitriol. I’m sure it’s their unhappiness that drives their behaviour too.

Marriage requests?

Unfortunately, dubious and toxic behaviour isn’t uncommon. I’m fortunate I’ve only come across a handful of loons in my time on LinkedIn, but you may well come across them.

Don’t be afraid to block and report, if you receive harmful messages.


As long as you are constructive in what you write, and you work to build a conversation, it’s unlikely anything bad will happen, while you open yourself up to the opportunity of new relevant people starting conversations with you:

hiring managers, recruiters, peers, fellow job seekers, and friendly strangers.


  1. how and why to write a flair post that promotes you


If you only ever write one LinkedIn post, it can be the one that announces your availability to the world.

I’ve no doubt you’ve read the many posts highlighting that someone’s position has been made redundant / laid off, and that they are excited for the next challenge. Perhaps they are even grateful for the time they had with their now former employer.

These often get a ton of engagement, primarily from fellow job seekers, recruiters and friendly strangers.

If their real-life network sees this, they may not even be aware that person was soon to be available. In a lucky coincidence, they may even have a vacancy or know someone recruiting for a suitable role.

But when you read these posts yourself, what can you tell about that person’s credibility from what they’ve written, if all you have is the evidence of their words?


Writing a post that announces your availability is a good idea.

Writing something similar that highlights what you are looking for, your key strengths and how you can help - that’s a post you can take forward.

Because as well as announcing your availability, you’ll show people you don’t know what you are suited for, helping them potentially help you.

While people who check out your profile first, say if you’ve sent an application, may read that post in support of the other information they have. And you can share it in DMs with your real-life network when you catch up with them.


I’d write this post in the classic advertising framework - AIDA: attention interest desire action. It’s the basis of many adverts that influence you to buy.

Attention.

This is your elevator pitch to set the scene. It can be clever or to the point.

“Following the layoffs at ABC Corp I’m now available for my next HR Director challenge, where I can set the people strategy and help scale your business by hiring great people who will improve your bottom line”

Interest.

Highlight your key qualities, which make you stand out.

“I’m MBA and CIPD qualified, with experience growing venture backed Biotech companies as they commercialise, through workforce planning and fostering a great culture”.

Desire.

Turn the screw on what makes you great.

“At ABC corp, I was instrumental in growing their team from 50 people at R&D stage to 350 with a turnover of £110m, leading to the sale of the business to Evil Overlord ltd, who promptly scrapped my job”

Action.

Make it easy for them to contact you (although don’t include email addresses or websites in the post, which LinkedIn will penalise).

“Please get in touch if you know of a suitable role or agency. I’d be grateful if you could like, comment and share for your network”

In your own words, of course.


I helped one of my connections with her first flair post.

As someone who had low engagement (less than ten reactions and few comments per post), this form of flair post led to:

Impressions: 12128
Reactions: 106
Comments 39
Reposts: 13
Additional profile views since posting: 188
Additional connection requests since posting: 50

Within a week of posting.


You may think of this as a salesy approach (there’s nothing wrong with selling btw, it’s a noble art), but I look at it as raising awareness with your network, to help them help you. Few decent people will judge you for asking for help.


  1. fine-tuning to form a habit


It’s a good idea to set a sustainable plan for content writing, which you can adjust on the fly.

Maybe it will look something like this:

  • Comment on 5 posts a day

  • Send 5 connection requests a day

  • DM 5 existing connections a day

  • Write 5 posts a month

Gamifying helps.

Expectation setting is a good idea too. I see many great writers get zero engagement and it takes time to build - LinkedIn is a hungry beast and penalises time away, especially early on.

But even if you have a long-term plan, posts that fly, such as a timely flair post (make sure to DM me if you write one), can galvanise you to write more.

While, there will be times you don’t have the motivation to write, in which case you can re-purpose your previous content.

If someone didn’t see your flair post, for example, the first time around, you’re helping them by re-posting. While those who have seen it will only be reminded of your availability.

Besides, few people remember or notice repeated content online. While, when you watch TV adverts, you’ll always enjoy seeing a good one again.


  1. what else?


Writing content is, for me, a low-friction way of promoting yourself. From relationships I’ve started through content, I’ve been invited on podcasts, LinkedIn lives, and other marketing activities.

It’s led to many real-life conversations where I’ve been able to help employers and job seekers, including paid recruitment.

However, it is easy to get swept up in LinkedInnitis, where you do it for its own sake.

If you find you’re on LinkedIn because of how it makes you feel, it’s worth taking a step back and revisiting what you want to achieve.

LinkedIn is a business and wants to trap you into its platform - check out the Social Dilemma on Netflix for why and how this happens.

But if you keep intentional, it’s a wonderful marketing platform, research tool, and community. And something you can take advantage of.


That’s the end of this mini-series. Feel free to get in touch if you have any questions, or need some help writing content.

Thanks for reading.

Regards,

Greg

By Greg Wyatt June 11, 2026
What follows is Chapter 43 from A Career Breakdown Kit. Is it a magic salve guaranteed for success? No of course not. But much like anything in a job search, nothing is guaranteed. What we do is identify which avenues can be effective for your context, and form an appropriate strategy. LinkedIn optimisation is great if people search for you on LinkedIn. Except speaking to my recruitment peers, fewer and fewer rely on it. Would it surprise you if I told you I rarely invested in at all before 2019? I've been working in recruitment since 1996 including at CEO level. Applications, networking, referrals, content, CV databases. All have a place and a purpose. Doorknocking on the other hand - some would tell you it has no place in the modern job search. If my daughter*, her friends and other 18 year olds can get a job from an old school technique, while those employers say "only through Indeed" then that might be a hint it still works. Some of whom are socially anxious, but then it's a replicable process, not a cult of personality. Or the periodic messages I get from CxOs who made their own jobs from direct outreach. Not forgetting Granovetter's seminal research and recent LinkedIn-specific studies in Science journal showing weak ties drive more job mobility than strong ties. And why wouldn't doorknocking work on LinkedIn, when you have a weak tie that suggests a viable employer? But no, it's not a guarantee. It's just an arrow in the quiver of a multichannel job search. 43 - How to doorknock Doorknocking is an old-school sales approach you may well have experienced, such as when a salesperson with a clipboard rings your doorbell and asks you to change electricity provider. My wife even once bought from exactly this scenario. While it’s not uncommon in a business-to-consumer situation it can also work business-to-business… if you can get past security. Although technology has moved on, the principle is the same whether in person, by phone, email, letter or LinkedIn: You approach someone cold and create your own opportunity. This isn’t an approach for everyone and requires chutzpah. If you are used to a high failure rate in applications - what do you have to lose by being proactive? More than that - look at all the advice on LinkedIn on how to improve your odds in a job search. It’s all transactional and applicable, available to everyone - if you all follow it, everyone takes the same step forward. While taking steps others are less prepared to do means the approach alone may stand out. If you encounter the equivalent of a sign which says, ‘Trespassers will be shot!’, pay attention. My own career of looking for work includes many non-transactional approaches: Walked into the local Cinema and asked for a job Walked into Office World and asked for a job Worked for Dad Talked to one of my ex-colleagues and gained some by-the-call phone research work Temped through an agency Walked into an Inn and asked for a job Referred to a publishing, training & consulting company In managing their small-scale recruitment alongside my day job I got to know the MD of a recruitment firm as a supplier. I went to work there Tapped up to return to a more senior role Started my business upon being given the boot - thanks Dave! It’s true I did apply through job boards and agencies. It’s mainly through my own means that I have secured my employment. *My daughter even tried doorknocking for her first job in our local town last summer. It didn’t work for her - she found a nice retail job through an application on Indeed. Her experience was positive enough that she helped a friend do the same - who got a job at the first shop they tried. Doorknocking is about approaching companies by category not because they are recruiting. These categories can be: All the employers in your local business park (often they have websites, with directories and job adverts) Companies listed in local newspapers, directories or platforms (local to me this could be Cambridge Evening News, Bury Free Press, Cambridge Network or Business Weekly) Top 100 employers in your domain Companies that have recently had funding and are about to scale Doorknocking companies you’ve come across through networking and its resulting market map Make contact and make a case for yourself on the principle of the right person, right time, right place, right message, right offer, and right price. There’s an element of luck involved for these elements to all come together. A disadvantage is that they may not be recruiting or ever have a need to employ you and even if they do have a vacancy, you still have to establish the right fit. That means a logically low hit rate. Your threshold for an acceptable failure rate will inform whether this is the right approach for you. The difference is the anonymous rejection of a volume-based application versus the ‘personal rejection’ from your direct outbound approach. Right person, right time, right place, right message, right offer, and right price. Let’s reorder and examine this marketing principle: Right Place Those Categories above. The place is the Company, and how you contact them. You can go in blind if you are a bold prospector or research them in advance. ‘site:’ is a useful command in Google. You can search on specific websites: ‘site: linkedin.com ACME jobs’ Right Person Typically this will be the ‘next one up’ - Head of department, Director, CxO or Owner. Who would be the budget holder at work? Those are prospects. Look them up on LinkedIn, PR, news, video platforms. What can you find out? Right Time While time can be happenstance, can timed factors create opportunity? What might be a hiring trigger? Perhaps you could contact a list of companies that have recently announced funding or a big win - news that may lead to hiring additional people. Or maybe you hear through the grapevine that Janine is about to go off on maternity leave. If their process isn’t time-bound, can you make it time-bound? ‘We aren’t hiring right now’ might mean they’ve run out of headcount in the January to June period and may have a new budget in July. What can you learn that helps you both? If you have radio silence, why not try again in a month or three months? Think about how you buy. If you don’t need something how likely are you to respond to a message no matter how well crafted? If you do need something you might think first of someone who keeps in regular touch. Right Offer You have more opportunity for career creativity in being unemployed than someone entrenched in a 9 to 5 permanent job. What problems can you fix for a company in a non-traditional employment capacity? Let’s say an employer has a problem that needs fixing. They don’t have capacity to do it right now. It isn’t burning enough to seek professional help and there isn’t sufficient work in view to make it a job. What if you caught them at the right time? An out-of-work TA Manager who offered to revamp an onboarding process. A web designer who notes lots of issues with their website. A strategic operational issue that is their unknown unknown identified by your expertise. A swamped team that could benefit from their admin burden being reduced. An orchard that needs pickers at harvest time. What starts out as a short-term, project, or part-time piece of work can become proof of concept. While rare, I know a few people whose permanent full-time jobs have come about this way, including at a senior level. Right message This is both specific and crude. It’s specific because nailing the message CAN create an opportunity a poorly written message may miss. It’s crude because sometimes you can catch people at the right time, no matter how cruddy your message is. This is the case in recruitment - I’ve picked up several senior appointments by calling at the right time. ‘I’m glad you called Greg, I’m starting to think about my maternity cover in June.’ Had I not called, that HR Director may well have gone to the specialist HR recruiters she is also in touch with. If you have a strong hook in your message - such as a key area of rare expertise or a clear issue you’ve identified which companies may have - go in with that. If you don’t - done is better than procrastinating: ‘Hi Greg, I live locally to Bircham Wyatt Recruitment. Love what you do. I wondered if you might be recruiting for an apple picker at any point. If you can’t help, could you point me in the right direction?’ Right price I’ve left this until the end because much of this is variable and subjective. What are your needs? What can they afford? What does the market say? How flexible can you be? Research will help if you can get a sense of what they generally pay through Indeed, Glassdoor or others. Or maybe what comparable companies that are advertising will pay. One approach might be to pro-rate your salary over the period you’ll work there. Doorknocking can sometimes give you access to jobs that are being actively recruited. It’s a happy byproduct of your work, if you find yourself in this situation. It’s worth persevering. Otherwise, it’s too easy to think after 10, 20, or 100 unsuccessful efforts that the approach itself is at fault. There is always an element of luck in any activity. This may be out of your comfort zone, in which case it’s an opportunity to grow. The only certain thing is that if you don’t try you definitely won’t benefit.
By Greg Wyatt June 4, 2026
Listening to the consequences of your recruitment process is an opportunity. I do find it interesting go through my older articles. How has my thinking changed? Has it improved? How was I so cringy? Looking at this article in its August 2023 form, I hadn't yet focused on Candidate Resentment as an opportunity to improve how we recruit. Not because it's decent to treat people better, but because that is a happy byproduct of strategically assessing our work as it supports our goals. Whether that's filling vacancies or finding people that meet our goals long-term and flourish doing so. Root canal If you recognise that speaking to the potential problems of the people you want to engage is a good idea, you may also recognise why you shouldn't create any problems that push them away. Engagement is an ongoing process that carries through every stage of recruitment, even into employment. Yes, bring your candidates forward, in part by showing how you solve their career problems. But, don’t throw up unnecessary issues that undo your good work. Listening to the consequences of your recruitment process is an opportunity. Why did that candidate proceed? Why did another withdraw? What raised concern? What about the potential candidates we don’t even know about? What influenced their decisions? I’ve spoken to tens of thousands of candidates, prospects, applicants, and everything else, during my career. Out of curiosity, I’m always interested in what influences their decisions in their pursuit of a new career. What fascinates me is that these are the Gemba , the unknown unknowns that we can extrapolate into our own recruitment processes. What problems do they encounter elsewhere, that discourage them from applying, that encourage them to withdraw, and why? And how might we be guilty of the same? While if we are guilty, how can we fix these problems, so that the objection never comes up? Imagine that - the reader that might have walked away, who instead chooses to engage. This may seem an unknowable unknown, but one of the benefits of my job seeker work is hearing about the issues they encounter on their side of recruitment and how that may influence their decisions. Considering these are people that are very problem aware, their appetite for bullshit is in some ways higher than the problem unaware (passive in old speak). While in others, what you may consider normal behaviour, they consider red flags. While we can’t control the behaviour of candidates, we can learn what influences their behaviour and form a process that nudges, draws forward or mitigates when needed. What are we accountable for that might present a problem for a candidate we want to employ? Especially when, in normal life, moving jobs is one of the biggest stresses? How might we unnecessarily cause scepticism or anxiety? Auditing your own recruitment process as a mystery candidate is one opportunity. As is surveying your staff for their experience - with the caveat they are happy to be working for you, skewing their perception. Or perhaps they're terrified of losing their jobs. Do they really want to rock the boat with criticism? But it’s the candidates who withdraw, who hesitate, who object that can be the source of the biggest improvements. What would you say their common complaints are? You can look to LinkedIn for the answer, in their high-engagement posts. Salary on the job description (they mean the advert) ATS data duplication Responsiveness and transparency Tardy, bloated and unnecessary recruitment stages A robotic process that forgot they are human Which becomes your choice. Do you look within and challenge yourself with 5 Whys to see how you can improve? Do you take away problems before they can occur? Saving your candidates unnecessary toothache? Or do you lay blame on the areas you can’t control? Those are the questions. Regards, Greg p.s. I’m available for interesting work - UK key hires, fractional talent acquisition and recruitment writing. Maybe we can talk. p.p.s. A Recruitment AiDE is out now - the discipline for UK key hire recruitment