After the interview

Greg Wyatt • June 19, 2024

In a tough job search, getting to an interview in itself can feel like a real achievement.

If you’ve been accountable in your applications, only going for roles where you are a strong fit, these are tangible opportunities to secure employment.

But the interview itself isn’t the be-all and end-all.

It’s better to see them as the start of a conversation, one that’s only complete when you either have an acceptable employment contract in your hand, or if it’s an unequivocal no.

Continuing this conversation in the right way, and in ways other candidates may not think to, can bring both marginal and maximal gains.

Today we’ll look at:

  1. Thank you notes

  2. Additional interviews

  3. Appropriate follow-ups

  4. Keeping in touch long-term


Let me tell you a recent story to set the scene.

A few weeks back I filled a vacancy which had a strong shortlist. The final three were all employable, and the company would have taken all three had they been able to.

The second choice candidate was very disappointed but took it well, with good grace.

I worked hard to give all three a good experience, with regular updates and constructive feedback. I too was genuinely disappointed for the ‘unsuccessful’ candidates.

Two weeks after accepting the offer and returning the signed contract, the first-choice candidate withdrew. She’d received a significantly improved offer having been headhunted.

Within two hours of passing the news on to the hiring team, the 2nd choice candidate was offered and accepted the role.

There’s detail I’m not including here, but the key point is that her behaviour during the process, and how she took the initial ‘no’ contributed to a very easy decision to employ her.

How we treated her during the initial process, and her ‘no’, contributed to an easy decision for her to accept.

It’s reciprocal.


In many ways, an interview is like a sales meeting.

One party pitches their offering, which might be customised against the questions asked.

The other party makes a decision on whether and how to proceed.

In an interview though, this is equally true of a candidate and the employer being the seller, and the other the buyer.

However, this isn’t an equal and proportionate reflection.

As a job seeker, you get the final say on whether you say yes, no or something in between. Your decision is influenced by factors you may not divulge to the employer, such as an unexpected intervention (illness, accident, family), personal circumstances or other offers that may come up.

It’s the same for the employer. They may have a hierarchy of decision-making, changes in the business, and changes outside of the business - many things that can influence an interview decision or time frame, away from what was initially agreed.

In a sales process, we know that a deal isn’t agreed upon until the invoice is paid, so even if there is an initial ‘yes’ in a meeting, we follow up suitably to get closure.

It looks something like this:

  • Follow-up email to confirm details of the conversation and next step. Thank you for your time

  • Follow up at the appropriate time frame to check progress

  • If it’s ‘no right now’ follow up over time to build a relationship until they are ready to buy

  • If it’s ‘no answer’ finding appropriate reasons to follow up, ending in a breakup email

However what it actually looks like is predicated on understanding what their sales (hiring) process is, playing to their rules and breaking those same rules in an appropriate way.


You can take those bullet points pretty much word for word in an interview process.

In the UK 61% of private sector employers are SMEs, with the remainder Corporates, although the vast majority of the money is in the corporate space.

The differentiator in recruitment is that the more corporate you get, the more transactional and matrix-led recruitment becomes.

Some of the rules of the game will be different.


This is an oversimplification to highlight how and why things are different depending on the context. Public sector, charities, geography, bias, habit, strategy - everything informs what appears similar process from the jobseeker perspective.


A ‘thank you’ note might be seen as meaningless corporately, other than as a thank you.

Whereas in an SME it might be seen as responsive behaviour that’s a sign of what someone is like to work with.

I’ve seen both scenarios, including where the behaviour in between interviews has contributed to a candidate being appointed, in a tight decision.

Even in corporations, decision-makers always have biases. Just because the company extols ‘systemic best practice’ doesn’t mean those same decision-makers follow the rules in their mind.

Ideally, aim to understand what you are dealing with, to inform the tactics you take.


A caveat on the following points: it’s important not to be cynical or come across as coercive. Be respectful of the process, unless that process is working against you unreasonably.


  1. Thank you notes

Most of the employers I partner with are interested in their candidates’ feedback and interest post-interview - to help them reach the right decision for the right reason.

Were you applying directly to them, their interest in your view would be the same.

A naturally written thank you note sent appropriately, will never work against you.

It might work for you, and it’s a situation where someone’s bias can be a benefit.

“Dear Greg,

I wanted to thank you for your time today, and the opportunity to interview at ABC Corp.

It was a pleasure to meet you and Gary, and helpful to understand more about your role and environment. I remain keen and would be delighted to return for the next stage if you are in agreement.

You mentioned you’ll make a decision by the end of next week, and I look forward to hearing from you in due course.

Do let me know if I can help with anything in the meanwhile - my number is ….

Kind regards,”

But it’s also an opportunity to build on, or mitigate, elements in an interview, for instance, if there’s an example you neglected to share, or if you didn’t convey information in the right way.

Maybe they let slip they’d be concerned if the role would keep your interest in the long term - why not own this?

“During the interview, you asked if I could see myself in this role long-term. It’s certainly a role I’d enjoy - taking on a hands-on role I can get stuck into is an exciting challenge, while I think my experience in xxx would be beneficial for yyy”

That kind of thing.

Try and keep it more succinct than my email though!

Write it in your own words, in a similar tone to how you came across in the interview.

Will it make a difference? Only marginally, in some situations.

Is it worth doing, as a natural way to continue the conversation? I think so.

Don’t be disheartened if you don’t get a reply - they may have a visible policy to follow.

And to that coercive point above definitely don’t say

“I’m the best candidate, you’d be a fool to miss out” or something more subtle that might suggest the same.


  1. Additional interviews

In an ideal world, you’d get a full view of the interview process before the interview.

However, some employers like to play a game of interview chicken, unveiling more and more interview stages as you go through them.

Most are somewhere in between.

It’s a good idea to try and establish the full process as early as possible, in case there is anything that is non-negotiable for you.

For example, I know some people categorically do not want to do technical tests or ‘business plan’ style presentations, having had their fingers burnt in the past.

It’s your choice what might be a non-negotiable, but for any reasonable employer, these are typically used as means for fair assessment.

I’d treat any interview in the same way as the first interview: prepare as fully as possible and assume nothing.

Unless you know their hierarchy of decision-making, that new person you meet at fourth stage for an informal chat might well be the person with the final say.

Even a social get-together after an offer is put forward might be seen as an assessment.


  1. Appropriate follow-ups

It’s a careful balance. You want to show you are interested, but not desperate. You need an answer, but not to be inappropriately intrusive - even if that’s not your intent, perception holds weight.

Following up in the right way is a good tactic, in sales and in interviews.

If you can gain an understanding of their time frames or process, work to that.

But anything and everything can happen behind the scenes, including unexpected absences, so things do slip in a way employers may not see as notable.

On the Tuesday after the Friday you were expecting to hear, drop them a polite line.

“Hi Greg,

I wondered if you had any news on how you want to proceed with this role. Is there any news you can share?

Kind regards,”

You can play a bit of keeping up with the Joneses too, if it’s true -

“I remain interested - I do have two interviews this week with other employers. Would you like me to keep you updated?”

Sometimes no news is no news, and if you can afford to be patient do so.

Eventually, you may come to a point where you need a decision from them to facilitate a decision from you on another endeavour - such as if your 2nd choice company gives you a job offer.

A breakup email can be a good thing. This may not prompt a decision from them, or even an answer, but if that’s the case you give yourself agency to walk away with no ‘what ifs?’

And if they do come back later, you can make a separate decision on whether you revisit them.

One such email might be

“Hi Greg,

I enjoyed our interview on May 21st. You mentioned you’d reach a decision the following week. Can I assume you have moved forward with another candidate?

I’ll draw a line through my application for now, however, I’ll be happy to pick up our conversations at a later date if you are still recruiting.

Kind regards,”

Written appropriately there are three outcomes:

  • You get a reply confirming they have appointed

  • You get no reply and can move on

  • You get a reply with more information

That last point may be simply ‘no news’, or something actionable. Sometimes it might even prompt good news.

Whatever the outcome, you can move forward.


  1. Keeping in touch long-term

Sometimes a no might be a ‘no for now’, especially when you are later on in the process, such as being pipped to the post at final interview.

In many situations that may be the last interaction you’ll have with a company.

However, if yours is a ‘business as usual role’ where there are a number of employees fulfilling similar duties in the same company, you may well be suitable for other roles that come up in future.

How can you keep in touch appropriately so that you help them reach straightforward decisions when another vacancy does come up?

Find reasons to occasionally keep in touch (maybe once every couple of months).

If they are active on LinkedIn, you could follow their content and add constructive comments.

Keeping in touch long-term is about building a networking relationship which you both might benefit.

It may come to nothing, but it may give you early, and even only, sight of a new vacancy.

Of course, if you see another vacancy advertised, check it out. Personally I’d drop them a line directly rather than apply, given you are continuing a conversation, rather than come in cold.

And if they reply to say ‘don’t bother’, at least you know!


That’s the end of this interview series. Anything you’d like me to cover in the next episode?

Regards,

Greg

By Greg Wyatt June 11, 2026
What follows is Chapter 43 from A Career Breakdown Kit. Is it a magic salve guaranteed for success? No of course not. But much like anything in a job search, nothing is guaranteed. What we do is identify which avenues can be effective for your context, and form an appropriate strategy. LinkedIn optimisation is great if people search for you on LinkedIn. Except speaking to my recruitment peers, fewer and fewer rely on it. Would it surprise you if I told you I rarely invested in at all before 2019? I've been working in recruitment since 1996 including at CEO level. Applications, networking, referrals, content, CV databases. All have a place and a purpose. Doorknocking on the other hand - some would tell you it has no place in the modern job search. If my daughter*, her friends and other 18 year olds can get a job from an old school technique, while those employers say "only through Indeed" then that might be a hint it still works. Some of whom are socially anxious, but then it's a replicable process, not a cult of personality. Or the periodic messages I get from CxOs who made their own jobs from direct outreach. Not forgetting Granovetter's seminal research and recent LinkedIn-specific studies in Science journal showing weak ties drive more job mobility than strong ties. And why wouldn't doorknocking work on LinkedIn, when you have a weak tie that suggests a viable employer? But no, it's not a guarantee. It's just an arrow in the quiver of a multichannel job search. 43 - How to doorknock Doorknocking is an old-school sales approach you may well have experienced, such as when a salesperson with a clipboard rings your doorbell and asks you to change electricity provider. My wife even once bought from exactly this scenario. While it’s not uncommon in a business-to-consumer situation it can also work business-to-business… if you can get past security. Although technology has moved on, the principle is the same whether in person, by phone, email, letter or LinkedIn: You approach someone cold and create your own opportunity. This isn’t an approach for everyone and requires chutzpah. If you are used to a high failure rate in applications - what do you have to lose by being proactive? More than that - look at all the advice on LinkedIn on how to improve your odds in a job search. It’s all transactional and applicable, available to everyone - if you all follow it, everyone takes the same step forward. While taking steps others are less prepared to do means the approach alone may stand out. If you encounter the equivalent of a sign which says, ‘Trespassers will be shot!’, pay attention. My own career of looking for work includes many non-transactional approaches: Walked into the local Cinema and asked for a job Walked into Office World and asked for a job Worked for Dad Talked to one of my ex-colleagues and gained some by-the-call phone research work Temped through an agency Walked into an Inn and asked for a job Referred to a publishing, training & consulting company In managing their small-scale recruitment alongside my day job I got to know the MD of a recruitment firm as a supplier. I went to work there Tapped up to return to a more senior role Started my business upon being given the boot - thanks Dave! It’s true I did apply through job boards and agencies. It’s mainly through my own means that I have secured my employment. *My daughter even tried doorknocking for her first job in our local town last summer. It didn’t work for her - she found a nice retail job through an application on Indeed. Her experience was positive enough that she helped a friend do the same - who got a job at the first shop they tried. Doorknocking is about approaching companies by category not because they are recruiting. These categories can be: All the employers in your local business park (often they have websites, with directories and job adverts) Companies listed in local newspapers, directories or platforms (local to me this could be Cambridge Evening News, Bury Free Press, Cambridge Network or Business Weekly) Top 100 employers in your domain Companies that have recently had funding and are about to scale Doorknocking companies you’ve come across through networking and its resulting market map Make contact and make a case for yourself on the principle of the right person, right time, right place, right message, right offer, and right price. There’s an element of luck involved for these elements to all come together. A disadvantage is that they may not be recruiting or ever have a need to employ you and even if they do have a vacancy, you still have to establish the right fit. That means a logically low hit rate. Your threshold for an acceptable failure rate will inform whether this is the right approach for you. The difference is the anonymous rejection of a volume-based application versus the ‘personal rejection’ from your direct outbound approach. Right person, right time, right place, right message, right offer, and right price. Let’s reorder and examine this marketing principle: Right Place Those Categories above. The place is the Company, and how you contact them. You can go in blind if you are a bold prospector or research them in advance. ‘site:’ is a useful command in Google. You can search on specific websites: ‘site: linkedin.com ACME jobs’ Right Person Typically this will be the ‘next one up’ - Head of department, Director, CxO or Owner. Who would be the budget holder at work? Those are prospects. Look them up on LinkedIn, PR, news, video platforms. What can you find out? Right Time While time can be happenstance, can timed factors create opportunity? What might be a hiring trigger? Perhaps you could contact a list of companies that have recently announced funding or a big win - news that may lead to hiring additional people. Or maybe you hear through the grapevine that Janine is about to go off on maternity leave. If their process isn’t time-bound, can you make it time-bound? ‘We aren’t hiring right now’ might mean they’ve run out of headcount in the January to June period and may have a new budget in July. What can you learn that helps you both? If you have radio silence, why not try again in a month or three months? Think about how you buy. If you don’t need something how likely are you to respond to a message no matter how well crafted? If you do need something you might think first of someone who keeps in regular touch. Right Offer You have more opportunity for career creativity in being unemployed than someone entrenched in a 9 to 5 permanent job. What problems can you fix for a company in a non-traditional employment capacity? Let’s say an employer has a problem that needs fixing. They don’t have capacity to do it right now. It isn’t burning enough to seek professional help and there isn’t sufficient work in view to make it a job. What if you caught them at the right time? An out-of-work TA Manager who offered to revamp an onboarding process. A web designer who notes lots of issues with their website. A strategic operational issue that is their unknown unknown identified by your expertise. A swamped team that could benefit from their admin burden being reduced. An orchard that needs pickers at harvest time. What starts out as a short-term, project, or part-time piece of work can become proof of concept. While rare, I know a few people whose permanent full-time jobs have come about this way, including at a senior level. Right message This is both specific and crude. It’s specific because nailing the message CAN create an opportunity a poorly written message may miss. It’s crude because sometimes you can catch people at the right time, no matter how cruddy your message is. This is the case in recruitment - I’ve picked up several senior appointments by calling at the right time. ‘I’m glad you called Greg, I’m starting to think about my maternity cover in June.’ Had I not called, that HR Director may well have gone to the specialist HR recruiters she is also in touch with. If you have a strong hook in your message - such as a key area of rare expertise or a clear issue you’ve identified which companies may have - go in with that. If you don’t - done is better than procrastinating: ‘Hi Greg, I live locally to Bircham Wyatt Recruitment. Love what you do. I wondered if you might be recruiting for an apple picker at any point. If you can’t help, could you point me in the right direction?’ Right price I’ve left this until the end because much of this is variable and subjective. What are your needs? What can they afford? What does the market say? How flexible can you be? Research will help if you can get a sense of what they generally pay through Indeed, Glassdoor or others. Or maybe what comparable companies that are advertising will pay. One approach might be to pro-rate your salary over the period you’ll work there. Doorknocking can sometimes give you access to jobs that are being actively recruited. It’s a happy byproduct of your work, if you find yourself in this situation. It’s worth persevering. Otherwise, it’s too easy to think after 10, 20, or 100 unsuccessful efforts that the approach itself is at fault. There is always an element of luck in any activity. This may be out of your comfort zone, in which case it’s an opportunity to grow. The only certain thing is that if you don’t try you definitely won’t benefit.
By Greg Wyatt June 4, 2026
Listening to the consequences of your recruitment process is an opportunity. I do find it interesting go through my older articles. How has my thinking changed? Has it improved? How was I so cringy? Looking at this article in its August 2023 form, I hadn't yet focused on Candidate Resentment as an opportunity to improve how we recruit. Not because it's decent to treat people better, but because that is a happy byproduct of strategically assessing our work as it supports our goals. Whether that's filling vacancies or finding people that meet our goals long-term and flourish doing so. Root canal If you recognise that speaking to the potential problems of the people you want to engage is a good idea, you may also recognise why you shouldn't create any problems that push them away. Engagement is an ongoing process that carries through every stage of recruitment, even into employment. Yes, bring your candidates forward, in part by showing how you solve their career problems. But, don’t throw up unnecessary issues that undo your good work. Listening to the consequences of your recruitment process is an opportunity. Why did that candidate proceed? Why did another withdraw? What raised concern? What about the potential candidates we don’t even know about? What influenced their decisions? I’ve spoken to tens of thousands of candidates, prospects, applicants, and everything else, during my career. Out of curiosity, I’m always interested in what influences their decisions in their pursuit of a new career. What fascinates me is that these are the Gemba , the unknown unknowns that we can extrapolate into our own recruitment processes. What problems do they encounter elsewhere, that discourage them from applying, that encourage them to withdraw, and why? And how might we be guilty of the same? While if we are guilty, how can we fix these problems, so that the objection never comes up? Imagine that - the reader that might have walked away, who instead chooses to engage. This may seem an unknowable unknown, but one of the benefits of my job seeker work is hearing about the issues they encounter on their side of recruitment and how that may influence their decisions. Considering these are people that are very problem aware, their appetite for bullshit is in some ways higher than the problem unaware (passive in old speak). While in others, what you may consider normal behaviour, they consider red flags. While we can’t control the behaviour of candidates, we can learn what influences their behaviour and form a process that nudges, draws forward or mitigates when needed. What are we accountable for that might present a problem for a candidate we want to employ? Especially when, in normal life, moving jobs is one of the biggest stresses? How might we unnecessarily cause scepticism or anxiety? Auditing your own recruitment process as a mystery candidate is one opportunity. As is surveying your staff for their experience - with the caveat they are happy to be working for you, skewing their perception. Or perhaps they're terrified of losing their jobs. Do they really want to rock the boat with criticism? But it’s the candidates who withdraw, who hesitate, who object that can be the source of the biggest improvements. What would you say their common complaints are? You can look to LinkedIn for the answer, in their high-engagement posts. Salary on the job description (they mean the advert) ATS data duplication Responsiveness and transparency Tardy, bloated and unnecessary recruitment stages A robotic process that forgot they are human Which becomes your choice. Do you look within and challenge yourself with 5 Whys to see how you can improve? Do you take away problems before they can occur? Saving your candidates unnecessary toothache? Or do you lay blame on the areas you can’t control? Those are the questions. Regards, Greg p.s. I’m available for interesting work - UK key hires, fractional talent acquisition and recruitment writing. Maybe we can talk. p.p.s. A Recruitment AiDE is out now - the discipline for UK key hire recruitment